Meh. I don’t subscribe to his ‘two sides of a spectrum’ argument, mainly because I don’t think there’s equal footing between those searching for the truth and those attempting to obscure it.
To me the situation more resembles a nucleus of hardcore defenders and apologists surrounded by an Oort cloud of critics with varying angles, momenta, and eccentricities.
I have both, and a publisher. The book was finished months ago, and I just keep updating the manuscript. I have refrained from publishing it because I want it to have an ending. But whale backers keep denying me that. So I’m holding fast. You guys know me by now, I have the patience of a mule, and the tenacity of a shark. So I’m going to wait them out. :)
About a week ago on Sept 28th, CIG filed their opposition to CryTek’s second amended complaint. I haven’t covered it because they have a hearing coming up on Oct 10th in front of the judge, and I was going to wait and cover them both in a single article.
Also, as per the judge’s previous instructions, both parties got together and finally filed a Rule 26(f) discovery report/plan. Much to the chagrin of CIG of course, since they’ve been fighting to avoid discovery since January this year.
Also, as we only have insight to the project’s financials over in the UK, we have been waiting for both RSI (the parent shell company) and CIG (the UK development studio) to file their Dec 2017 financials. Earlier this week, RSI filed theirs. I will cover that in the same article sometime after the Oct 10th hearing.