If that's the claim being made, then why include language like:
"As a result of the loss of the Elemental Materials, and the detraction from programming, debugging and other responsibilities, Elemental was unsuccessful in the marketplace, earning a fraction of its anticipated profits and causing Plaintiff damages of over $1,000,000.".
Paragraph 31 of the claim states pretty unambiguously that part of the reason Elemental failed was that Stardock was distracted from its programming, debugging, and other development processes.
Paragraph 30 goes to the same point:
"30. Additionally, Plaintiff had to spend vital time leading up to the release of Elemental attempting to re-create the Elemental Materials, rather than programming, debugging and otherwise readying Elemental for release."