It being on the list now means that it’s been selling well recently (I’d guess it’s a window of 1-2 days), it doesn’t mean it’s been a top seller for years.
I just meant that I’ve noticed it on the top few of the Top Sellers list for ages. I only asked about it today, but I’m pretty sure it’s been up there for a year or more (at least since the Remastered version hit back in 17).
I actually have the game from way back in the day when it first came out in the US, but I bought it directly from them, not thru Steam. I tried to reinstall it last year and it never would redownload properly.
Fair enough :) It was indeed somewhere between 13th-24th position for highest grossing game on Steam last year:
BDO is indeed very pretty but like every Asian MMO localized to the west, it’s plagued with P2W elements and extreme grinding.
Oooohh, thanks. I was just looking for something like that on Steam. Figured it had to be there somewhere.
Top-sellers include microtransaction sales I believe? BDO is whale territory. There you go.
Also they’re doing some anniversary stuff so that probably increases player numbers a bit.
I didn’t know that but that makes sense. Thanks all for replying to my pre-coffee rambling.
Wishful thinking - When Microsoft said they wanted to bring Game Pass to everything, maybe they also meant Steam?
Improved security and routing for peer-to-peer networking. Basic functionality has been open sourced and is usable on any game, Steam not required.
I love these guys.
This is good!
That change can be described easily: we’re going to identify off-topic review bombs, and remove them from the Review Score.
On DRM or EULA focused reviews:
We had long debates about these two, and others like them. They’re technically not a part of the game, but they are an issue for some players. In the end, we’ve decided to define them as off-topic review bombs. Our reasoning is that the “general” Steam player doesn’t care as much about them, so the Review Score is more accurate if it doesn’t contain them. In addition, we believe that players who do care about topics like DRM are often willing to dig a little deeper into games before purchasing - which is why we still keep all the reviews within the review bombs. It only takes a minute to dig into those reviews to see if the issue is something you care about.
Filtering out the “political” stuff is good, filtering out issues with the software (and DRM in particular is a software issue) is very bad.
I appreciate that they’re doing something about this problem, but I absolutely don’t agree that DRM and EULA complaints should be excluded - they’re put there via developer/publisher decision and are still very much a part of the product you’re buying.
I don’t agree with the DRM or the EULA.
Well the reviews are still there, they just don’t count towards the score. And you can opt-out:
Finally, we’ve also enabled you to opt out of this entirely, if that’s your preference - there’s now a checkbox in your Steam Store options where you can choose to have off-topic review bombs still included in all the Review Scores you see.
I would hope, and frankly expect, that negative reviews due to predatory monetization aren’t considered off-topic.
Being able to leave in people getting mad about random shit is not the same as Steam not filtering relevant shit.
As I’d agree DRM ad EULAs are valid concerns revolving around games, maybe have a second set of data attached specifically to DRM? A review score wouldn’t work because most people won’t leave a positive review for a DRM service, but maybe link to a forum discussing any related issues gamers are having with it.