That’s a beautiful shot.

The developers describe it as a vertical neighborhood, part office, part residential. The FAA put a hard cap of 1,050 feet, due to the fact that downtown Seattle is beneath Sea-Tac’s approach and the proximity of Boeing Field. The design goes up to 1,049. It’ll sit lower on the hill than Columbia, but will still appear taller from a distance.

I was wondering about that. I’ve done surveying for ATCALS (ILS stuff mostly and VORTACs) and TERPS junk, so I was wondering how the FAA would view the new building. Cool information, thanks!

The FAA specialist for Washington State actually chimed in
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=2218760&highlight=faa

That entire thread was a great read! I’ve got to be honest, it takes a certain type of mind to really love the TERPS world. I’m glad that they have employees like him.

So back in a time before coronavirus when we could still travel, I visited Vietnam and Cambodia. Here are a few photos from that trip.

Early morning mist over the Mekong created really great light once the sun got up a bit.

Experimenting with limited light.

Brahman silhouettes

Chinese pond heron doing its thing.

My Doug Trumbull moment.

Museums are always more interesting with unscheduled wildlife.

More epic early morning light.

I can’t suitably caption this one.

Making rice paper.

Early morning at Angkor Wat.

Cockfighting as a tradition goes back nearly 900 years, but it was outlawed in 2009. However, traditions don’t die easily. This was just a practice run but the money comes out once all the tourists have left.

An erratic fantail is hard to photograph but patience paid off.

When not killing demons with their fists, monks have to do chores.

Absolutely gorgeous pix there mate, thanks!

Amazing fotos! Thanks for sharing!

Thanks, I guess I’ll be at home for a while so it might be good time to sort through a lot more photos!

I just bought an IR filter to experiment with. It’s simpler than getting the camera converted, but a lot harder and less flexible to use in practice, but I’ll give it a shot. I have an old 5 MP camera body that’s been gathering dust for a while so I might just convert the sensor in that instead.

I lugged my massive 8x10 outside for the first time yesterday, and shot a couple of frames of green-sensitive x-ray film. The film is double-sided and has no backing, so there’s a ton of halation around bright light which reduces the sharpness quite a bit, but given this stuff is like 1/20th the price of photographic B&W film (and can be handled under a red safe light), I’m more than happy to practice with it for a while. Plus, the blue/green sensitivity lends an interesting old look to just about any shot.

Those look like old glass plate photographs. Very neat.

Yeah they have a nice look to them. You must get some interesting comments while setting that up in public.

It’s a great conversation-starter! Both times I’ve gone out with it so far, I’ve had a number of people approach me to ask about it. For some, it seems like some mythological creature they’ve heard legend of but didn’t believe existed.

I will say, lugging the sucker about is a pretty decent upper-body workout. I’m starting to come around on Weston’s quote “Anything more than 500 yards from the car just isn’t photogenic.”

Maybe you can buy a hand truck with largish wheels so it works well over rough ground and you can build some sort of frame to snuggle it it into said handcart?

Maybe something like this that’s made for doors? Would be easy-peasy to build a frame to hold almost anything in this?

https://www.amazon.com/KEA-DDC100-Door-Dolly-Pneumatic/dp/B07GFV8VFQ/ref=sr_1_15?keywords=hand+truck+rough+terrain&qid=1584338106&sr=8-15

That is one awesome photograph (the others are great too, this one just stands out for me). I do hope he isn’t trying to clean the square, as it doesn’t appear to be working ;-)

Thanks, I loved that I was able to get that. There was a better shot with two of them screwing around, chucking dust at each other, but I couldn’t get the lens cap off in time. ;)

Putting this here, too
https://www.ppa.com/education-unlocked

A few more frames of 8x10 x-ray film. I’m starting to get the hang of metering for this stuff (~ISO 200 in afternoon sunlight, but down around 80 in the evening when the light begins to warm). Good thing I keep notes. And it’s cheap.

One problem I’ve run up against is that the massive (like, 6-inch diameter) shutter for my lens only goes up to 1/50th of a second, so in sunlight I have to stop down to f/32 in order to get the correct exposure. I would have preferred a shallower depth of field on the first two shots here.


This is my favorite (non-portrait) large-format shot I’ve taken so far. I think it’ll be my candidate for practice on contact prints. The boat in the background is visually distracting, and I wish I could have narrowed the depth of field significantly, but oh well. Need to get a good filter set.


I wanted everything to the right of the bow line to be out of focus, which I would have gotten at about f/8, but was limited by the light. And yes, this is taken from the same spot as above, but I flipped it horizontally because the manufacturer markings at the bottom of the film were otherwise backwards (the film is double-sided, and I must have loaded this holder the other way around. I’ll need to take note of the orientation of the packaging when loading holders in the future.


A bit cluttered visually, but I like the waves and the texture of the tree bark.


Overexposed. Took some post-production work to get tonal differentiation between the sky and reflections in the water.


Underexposed. Shadows crushed to black, leaving no detail in the tree trunks. Would have preferred another stop or so, with more light through the blossoms. Hard to see in this version, but the girl on the bench was giving me the side-eye.


The plaza was empty when I set up this shot, and then on cue, when I was ready to pull the dark slide, that couple came out and parked themselves there. Oh well.

Hey, that looks familiar.

(From last month).

It’s a beautiful structure, but I’ve found it really difficult to get a satisfying picture of it. I like the colors in yours.

Eventually, I’ll need to pick up a shorter lens for my 8x10. I currently just have a 375mm (well, 14.75") lens, which is considered “normal” for that format. I had to stand all the way back by the steps at the far side of the square to get that shot.