I think that being able to determine whether or not my aims have been undermined requires first understanding what those aims are. :)
You’re not married, you have a kid, and you have a 1950’s view of dating (men and women are totally different, women like being treated badly, revenge sex is awesome, it’s ok to exploit someone’s emotional state for sex, etc).
OK, along the same lines as the above, I have to assume a certain amount of intelligence on the part of the readers here. I shouldn’t have to up huge sign-posts that say:
—=== RIMBO IS ABOUT TO BE FACETIOUS ===—
Ahh, that’s the great thing about middle school girls; I keep getting older, and they stay the same age.
—=== END FACETIOUS BLOCK ===—
See, at some level, I expect that you should be able to figure it out on your own without me doing that.
I’m REALLY surprised that no one got the joke I made above. See… I referred to her as my “wife,” and then I said, that the difference between a wife and a girlfriend is that you have sex with a girlfriend.
Do I have to draw a picture for you? I mean, if I were to follow that comment with,
“See, get it? It’s because I’m NOT HAVING ANY SEX RIGHT NOW!!!”
Then, well, it’s not NEARLY as humorous. But, again, this requires a minor amount of intelligence on the part of the reader, which I generally assume over here because this is QT3 and not the comments section of a YouTube video.
I guess I could use this new-found information to lower the expectations I have of my audience, but I stubbornly refuse to. Quite honestly, if you can’t figure the above out on your own, then you’re not really my audience, and I’m just fine with making fun of you behind your back. Or in front of your face, since it seems to all be going over your head anyway. :)