Yeah, there was nothing presidential about exploiting a man you got killed for applause.

Any theories for why Van Jones fell so hard for it?

Maybe he’s angling for one of the upcoming Cabinet vacancies?

Most of the media did for some reason.

Because the media is a bunch of credulous fools who appear entirely incapable of understanding the way they continue to be played by the right wing propaganda machine.

Most of the national TV media talking heads are basically Faye Dunaway’s character in NETWORK - eager to analyze the emotional reaction of an audience for hours on end. But their own affect is damaged or broken.

While I’m here and talking about broken affect, here’s a perfectly unsettling mashup, like that montage of 90s infomercials set to “Please Please Please Let Me Get What I Want” by the Smiths:

I think my favorite comment of Kellyanne on her knees was something to effect of “Let us pray for the double amputee victim of the Bowling Green massacre”.

Edit: and then there’s this:

https://scontent.fphx1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16996340_1839709366278598_5141594788547763132_n.jpg?oh=556c9b3c12db61930f1a3a26bf6f4ab8&oe=59418146

I find that image a bit troubling for a couple of reasons. First, the big news outlets weren’t the ones getting in a huff about Conway sitting on the couch with her shoes off. In fact, they barely covered the meeting at all. The cartoon implies that they’re the ones going on about Conway’s furniture faux pas while ignoring the bigger issues, but that’s not true at all. It’s the social media goons that won’t let it go. Second, the cartoon itself misses the real news of the meeting. It wasn’t Conway’s shoes on the couch or Trump’s normal “war, military, nukes” bullshit. It’s the fact that the representatives of historically black colleges got used for a photo-op.

Here’s Morehouse College firing back:

http://www.morehouse.edu/collegestatements/officeofthepresidentstatementonhbcupresidentsvisittowhitehouse.html

[quote]
Many had high hopes about this meeting. There was much advance chatter about it being “historic,” and there were many signals from key Trump administration officials that they would surprise HBCUs with favorable treatment. Given my experience in the Obama administration, I knew this would require an extraordinary announcement. Why? Because I knew that President Obama had invested $3 billion more in HBCUs in his first six years than President Bush invested in his final six years. Therefore, since President Trump pledged to “do more for HBCUs than any other president has done before,” we could have reasonably expected him to get started by announcing at least an additional $500 million to HBCUs…this year! And beside the expectation of new funding, there was advance talk of changes like an aspirational goal of 5 to 10 percent for federal agency funding to HBCUs, a special HBCU innovation fund, large boosts in Pell Grant and Title III funding, and extra tax breaks for those in the private sector who contribute to HBCUs. But, instead of the long-awaited executive order containing or signaling any of those outcomes, the key change is a symbolic shift of the White House HBCU Initiative from the Department of Education to the White House. It is not possible to measure the impact of this gesture anytime soon, if ever.

It should also be noted that, in her luncheon speech to HBCU presidents yesterday, Education Secretary DeVos struck a discordant note when she said of HBCUs, “They started from the fact that there were too many students in America who did not have equal access to education. They saw that the system wasn’t working, that there was an absence of opportunity, so they took it upon themselves to provide the solution. HBCUs are real pioneers when it comes to school choice.”

But HBCUs were not created because the 4 million newly freed blacks were unhappy with the choices they had. They were created because they had no choices at all. That is not just a very important distinction, it is profoundly important. Why? Because, if one does not understand the crippling and extended horrors of slavery, then how can one really understand the subsequent history and struggle of African Americans, or the current necessities and imperatives that grow out of that history and struggle?[/quote]

Hahaha… oh boy. I hope this is a meme soon.

I can’t believe we might have 4-8 more years of this childish bullshit. All this talk of investigations - when will they actually start seriously DOING something and get to the bottom of it? Clinton’s head would already be on a spike outside Washington if the situations were reversed.

No! You’re the puppet!

@SenSchumer: Happily talk re: my contact w Mr. Putin & his associates, took place in '03 in full view of press & public under oath. Would you &your team?

Some context (via @kevincollier)

Presidential sausage-making. In order:
Top of /r/the_donald
Infowars Editor
Trump’s Director of Social Media
Trump’s official account

Check out the slideshow in the link.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/837767004236955649

Democrats saying they’ve never met with Russian officials when they have is just what Trump needed to make this all go away. Nice work, idiots.

Our President ladies and gentlemen, so not busy running the country in his first month in office that he has time to tweet out garbage like this all day long on a weekday. If Obama had spent this much time tweeting out personal attacks on Republican senators Conservatives would have had massive strokes from the outrage.

Also, as @rowe33 says, way to go dipshit Democrats. They just couldn’t shut up and let things happen, they had to give Trump and his people ammunition to fire back with.

https://twitter.com/frankthorp/status/837795553543131136