Matt_W
3988
I get thermometer scanned by a security guard who is in uniform and wearing a gun on my way in to work every day. Snapping a photo of that would look a lot less innocuous than a dude in a baseball cap. Agree with @Menzo, China is bad, but that photo is not a good illustration of badness.
For a time, I got thermometer scanned by a person in a hazmat suit backed by a guard wearing a gun anytime I tried to go into a grocery store. Now the hazmat suit is gone, and the armed guard has gone back to patrolling the parking lot, but I still get thermometer scanned.
Canuck
3990
That woman is clearly not on her way to work.
Tortilla
3991
Exactly. Iâm really not sure why we are pointing to pictures of china handling a pandemic much better than we did and trying to dunk on them.
vinraith
3992
Yeah, I feel like people arenât getting the context here. If that situation doesnât look threatening to you, you havenât been paying attention. And if you think itâs an example of good pandemic management, well, Iâm profoundly glad youâre not in charge.
ShivaX
3993
Does he come to your house and do it?
Agreed.
âItâs fine for agents of the state to demand you do what they want in your own home and if you donât look meek enough while they do it, maybe youâll just vanish, but this is actually a good way of doing things.â
Tortilla
3994
That situation doesnât look threatening. The lady was already locked in with her family. Thatâs what lockdown means. And itâs a proven effective method to stem the flow of a pandemic.
If youâve got a picture of someone being beaten or killed for refusing a temperature check then by all means letâs share and condemn. Until then, itâs just a picture of someone getting their temperature checked.
If the context is China is bad, I think everyone gets it. On the other hand, if thatâs the point, then the picture isnât really necessary, you can just go ahead and think, for good reason, that China is bad without that picture. Which is a way of saying that the picture, on its own, doesnât really make the case that China is bad.
vinraith
3996
They shoot you if you take that picture, but itâs right there in the subtext of this one.
ShivaX
3998
Nothing threatening about being locked in your home under threat of violence while men come and make demands of you?
Yeah, about that whole âno free pressâ thingâŚ
Dejin
3999
Hereâs the full speech. Itâs just under 10 minutes.
The last section where he talks about âThe America I knowâ and talks about Americans turning down nativism and violence and reaffirming their commitment to immigrants and refugees as well as embracing people of Islamic faith particularly makes it clear heâs not on the side of the Trumpers.
Still, I hold him responsible for an awful lot of the bad that followed 9/11 so while itâs a good speech, and although having Republican leaders take a stand for pluralism and against Trumpism is always important (and in my opinion brave and honorable), I canât give him too many props. He holds too much responsibility for where we are now. He should have been better when he was President and he should have vocally stood against Trump in 2016 and in 2020.
Even in that speech, heâs still selling the idea that we should be deeply frightened of bands of strangers 10,000 miles away from us, that theyâre a real and substantial and persistent and deadly threat to each and every one of us. And the selling of that fear that is, to a great extent, the cause of much that has gone wrong in the last 20 years.
Alstein
4001
To me, this was the difference between neocons and the fash we have today, though the former led to the latter.
The neocons at least had some sort of morality, even if it was deeply flawed and wrong, and they believed in an America that was worth something. They did way too many unforgivable, irredeemable things, but I donât see them as the total monster that the Republicans are today.
The current Republicans see everything as transactional, have no morality, and only care about grievance and not values.
This is not a defense of the neocons, but saying how much worse things are today, and what weâre facing is truly Americaâs biggest historical threat.
ZeTh1
4002
They never were neocons. The whole neocon thing suited them for a while. Now something else suits them.
Strollen
4003
I suppose America was due to have its Nero. Whatâs stunning is that so many other people mistook Nero for Lincoln and emulated his worse traits.
I appreciate you differentiating Neocon, from the monsters of todayâs Republican party.
In a piece I saw yesterday, supposedly about how Bush admin neocons had seen the error of their ways, Douglas Feith actually defended invading Iraq as a way of having prevented Iran from getting the bomb. They would do it all again, tomorrow.
The irony of that claim is Iran tried initiating a dialogue with the US and we stepped away.
Seriously. Bush and his cronies were fucking evil. Trump and his cronies are fucking evil. The Tea Party is fucking evil.
Poisoned fruit of the same diseased tree. Fuck them all. I hope they all get ass cancer.
Alstein
4007
Thereâs a difference between the evil paved from good intentions, and straight up chaotic evil demonspawn.