Timex
4694
No, it would make more sense for it to expire sooner.
It reduces the perceived cost by more, and then it can benefit you in midterm elections.
Houngan
4695
I guess Iâm just jaded, every year thereâs a Democrat president, thereâs a debt ceiling crisis. It seems like the highest form and the most obvious of political theater, until of course the brinksmen actually step over the cliff. Fuck Iâm tired.
Fun anecdote though, my father (GOP through and through) was a banker so isnât an idiot about Fed rates and whatnot, he went on a small tear about having to increase the interest rate recently and how it needed to be done, etc. etc. I asked him, âThen why didnât Trump do it during his great economy?â And briefly went over quantitative easing, 2008 onward, etc. Completely stumped him like never before. He literally said, âHuh, Iâm going to have to think about that a bit, then Iâll have an answer.â My mom cackled.
Menzo
4696
FWIW, the President doesnât control the Federal Reserve and canât dictate how or when they raise or lower the federal funds rate.
In fact, the Fed did increase interest rates during Trumpâs Presidency, much to his dismay.
Houngan
4697
Oh I know, but only a tiny bit, and weâve needed to rebuild the reservoir of quantitative easing since 2008 much more. That Trump hated it just means itâs a good thing.
Alstein
4698
Looks like some more gerrymandering news for Dems
They are likely to gain a seat in NM, as NM has decided to gerrymander. Also apparently Republicans in IA are going to accept the redistricting commission there, because they like the state legislative map, but I think it also gives the Dems another seat.
138
4699
Dammit, Manchin! (I actually canât believe that I am the least bit surprised, but I am.)
The thing is, Manchin isnât going to torpedo the debt limit increase, so heâs going to have to decide which way heâs willing to pass it.
Not sure if this is real or what it means. âExpedited reconciliation processâ would be McConnellâs dream, squandering the Dems shot at a BBB reconciliation bill.
Alstein
4702
I donât think even Sinema would let the government torpedo. The progressive caucus is betting on this. Theyâre willing to negotiate on the amount- which seems to be finalizing around $2T. But they want to establish the precedent as well, and filibuster abolishing serves them well.
God do I wish the President would just declare the debt ceiling to be bullshit and be done with that particular nonsense. Just pay on time as agreed, as the âshall not be questionedâ language pretty much implies, and let the Supremes sort it out.
Me, too, but I donât actually know how hard this would be to do. The government would have to go on issuing debt in order to raise funds to pay things; and theyâd be trying to issue debt that at least some people question the legitimacy of. What will a future court say about the viability of these treasury notes? Given that, would there be any takers, outside (maybe) the Fed? Thereâs no real way to know how this plays out until youâre in that predicament.
Thereâs always demand for US debt, because itâs literally the only game in town that wonât ever break the buck (unless brain-dead Freedom Caucus bozos are in charge and decide to shoot the US in the head for shits and giggles), and companies/institutions/governments, not to mention banks, have US dollars to park there. Sure, people can choose more risky options for savings, but whoever ends up with the dollars doesnât stuff them under their mattress, and there are reserve requirements, so eventually the net savings of the world in US dollars ends up in US debt instruments.
You really think the Supreme Court is going to plunge the US and world economies into (even temporary) chaos by questioning US-issued debt, especially when the plain language of the Constitution gives them an easy out? Talk about a self-inflicted wound (for the country and the Court). I suppose anything is possible but these are not dumb people.
This is why it frustrates the F*CK out of me when I hear the media reporting it as âif a debt ceiling increase isnât approved by [$date], the federal government will run out of money.â I yell at the damn radio, âNO you idiots. Itâll run out of legal authority to issue further debt instruments, and said legal authority is probably unconstitutional to begin with, especially when political parties are happy to use it as an extortion mechanism.â
Or, OR, do the trillion dollar platinum coin thing and tell McConnell and co. to go fuck themselves with their clever, bad-faith âcompromises.â
I donât know. Thatâs what this means:
Itâs all uncharted territory. Count me as on board with the admin saying fuck the debt ceiling, I suggested the idea up there âď¸, but it will hardly be smooth sailing even if they do.
I mean, the very first thing that happens is Ted Cruz runs to a federal court to try to get an injunction blocking the government from issuing new debt. I have no idea what that federal court will do.
Itâs all about raising the stakes with a ticking-clock countdown element to build drama and crank up the suspense. Screenwriting 101.
I mean, if this is a ticking clock scenario, can we water board McConnell?
This sort of thing makes it clear Manchin wants some kind of BBB reconciliation bill.
Menzo
4711
McConnell is truly a great, giving man. Note how it seems like heâs running the Senate now, since heâs the one who gets to decide what bills get voted on.

McConnellâs actual statement:
I donât know why some people are characterizing this as him blinking. Heâs offering:
- Dems can abandon their legislative plans in which case we will help them raise the debt ceiling in regular order, or
- Dems can waste their resolution shot on a clean debt ceiling increase done through reconciliation, which we wonât impede if it includes nothing else, or
- Dems can have some more time to try to do both their legislation and a debt ceiling increase, but we will fucking impede the hell out of it
I guess it is a tiny bit of a give, that last bit, but reallyâŚ