Not in DeFi! Why do you think you get such great interest rates? Because you’re willing to loan money to terrorists and drug dealers.

So if it’s easy to spoof a fake identity, why not borrow $10M in crypto and if it goes up 10% cash it in and walk away with your $1M profit? If it goes down in value, just walk away and trash your fake identity? Obviously, I don’t really understand crypto!

You can’t borrow $10M with a fake identity unless your debtor is an idiot.

It’s not a matter of faking an identity. You can get a crypto loan by putting up crypto as collateral.

My understanding is that this is working as designed. Whether the design is desirable is highly debateable. Beanstalk gave governance votes based on deposits. So this crypto-raider deposits enough cryptocurrency to get a majority vote and proposed to give all the money to themselves. They don’t need no steenkin’ regulations. No way. So this is the result. And it isn’t the first time this trick has been pulled… I’ve read articles about other crypto projects that have had this happen.

When the design lets someone withdraw $80M in crypto that the person didn’t own, I think the design debate is over.

I wonder if what the person(s) involved in this did is illegal? It has to be illegal, doesn’t it? It’s taking possession of something owned by someone else.

CoDe Is LaW!

In what jurisdiction? What if the person who did this is in Somalia? Play by dumb libertarian rules, die by dumb libertarian rules.

In my post, I called this person a “crypto-raider” because what they have done is an extreme cryptocurrency version of corproate raiding - a crypto version of Gordon Gekko. Buying a majority stake in a company and then stripping it of its assets seems to be legal, and popular. Eddie Lampert and Sears comes to mind. Is this morally right? It isn’t exactly illegal though.

Yeah, it doesn’t seem “illegal” in the way that they performed this raid was perfectly acceptable per the way the code was set up.

It is almost like putting this much money into systems this easily manipulated is a bad idea.

Who knows.

It depends on who you are. Designing a system that can easily be manipulated so you can become mega-rich sounds like a great idea to me!

A lot of these schemes where somebody absconds with a huge wad of cryptocurrency look a lot like inside jobs, or in many more cases, are explicitly just scams.

Yeah, that’s my assumption for most of these.

How odd that there should be so many criminals in and around a system designed to facilitate crime!

Here’s a technical analysis of what happened, in case anyone’s curious. It was a pretty slick attack, though the Beanstalk people left a bunch of dumb vulnerabilities for them to exploit.

Flash loan attacks are extremely common these days. Just search Web3IsGoingGreat for the term and you’ll see dozens of hits.

Again, I’m assuming most of these attacks are inside jobs by the people who design the systems or their friends.

Could be, but at least in this case the protocols are available for everyone to look at, so no need for an insider.

Oh, Thiel is a lot worse than Trumpy. He’s the patron of my old high school classmate Curtis Yarvin, aka Mencius Moldbug, the founding philosopher of the alt-right. He’s straight-up white supremacist.

The thief used “flash loans” which have basically zero duration. The currency is borrowed and returned in the same transaction.