Good comedians make people laugh. That’s literally the only meaningful measure of their skill. Everything else is just you bringing your own shit to the table.
CK is a good comedian. You know why? Because he made millions and millions of people laugh. In a entirely objective sense, he is a good comedian, even if you don’t like him.
But all that aside, right now, folks are judging him based on… What? 2 minutes of a set he did? What led up to that 2 minutes? What came after? Cause context usually matters. Based on the audience reaction, the crowd seemed to dig it. Is it possible that you are overreacting to a joke?
Let’s take this as an example, back from when CK was a darling of the left, instead of reviled.
That’s kinda of rough, right? There’s a big part of that set which, if you heard it alone, might be called “punching down”. Basically him making fun of a homeless dude, and everyone laughing.
Now, in reality, i think the message might be a bit more complex. When you get to the end, there’s maybe a little more about it, and it’s kind of making fun of the people in NY who think that trying to help a homeless person is wrong. Now that clip is only 3 minutes long, but what if you cut it off where he’s just talking about the homeless guy and everyone is laughing?
There’s a lot going on here with CK… There are folks who want him to just go away, and that’s fine. It’s not gonna happen, but it’s fine to want it. But then there are folks complaining about the substance of the routine… Without having actually heard the routine. That’s kind of foolish.
Now hey, maybe some of you guys actually heard the whole set before it was taken down. Ignoring that it’s just a test set, that would at least be better… but if you only heard 2 minutes? Or worse, only read the text of those two minutes?
But then, all of that stuff aside… It’s still just a joke. It’s literally a joke. You ain’t gonna like every joke. That’s just the way it is.