Oh fair point, especially as that is what I am accusing the advert of doing.
I’m all for women doing whatever they want and I do think women are pretty much as capable as men for most things.
Ofcourse there are some significant biological differences, but in today’s societies, for the most part, those variances in strength etc matter little.
I know several women who are stronger, fitter etc than many men I know, while at the same time I think men are overall generally stronger.
Simply put, if a man and a woman put in the same effort to getting strong etc, guess who ends up stronger?
However, the differences rarely matter, even in the military. There, standards exist and should be adhered to as those standards reflect the role required. Infantry have certain standards requiring a higher level of fitness than, say a refueling specialist.
But if a woman can handle it, in my book she’s welcome to be an Infanteer.
And that’s probably the most extreme example i can think of, where a biological difference might actually matter.
I also wonder if the glass ceiling we hear so much about is related to women taking time off work for families etc, or if it is a direct result of prejudice.
It’s probably a bit of both to be fair, but if I, and a woman, were to start the same job now but she were to go part time or take years off, and I were to not, should I not get seniority?
So, @delirium, I hope that makes it a bit clear.
I wouldn’t call myself a feminist, or a masculinist, or a SJW, or any of these things. I’d call myself a (mostly) sensible human being who fears that, in the course of trying to correct a wrong, certain movements (in this instance, feminism) risk tarring everyone with the same brush (in this case, men) because it seems to me to lead to a default attitude that
man = bad.
And imho that’s not a good starting place for discourse.