How do we tell who has the most posts now that the user list has been retired? I have to know how I stack up! I’m suddenly feeling competitive.

If your name isn’t Jason McCullough, you lose. So much for competition.

How indeed. You’re number 22.

TOP TEN QUARTER TO THREE POSTERS:
(Data valid as of reply post date. Post count may increase over time.)

Jason McCullough 32,917
Rimbo 22,496
Tom Chick 22,151
Robert Sharp 19,369
extarbags 19,329
Bill Dungsroman 19,122
Tyjenks 17,906
Andrew Mayer 17,683
Brian Rubin 17,354
Bahimiron 17,156

I miss Bill.

Whoa, when did Tom start posting so much?

Afraid he’ll catch you, Jason? ;-) More seriously, his post count is like yours, a body of work that stretches over many years.

Jason McCullough 32,919

I’m sure someone will pass me eventually, I’m not posting anywhere near enough anymore to retain the lead.

You miss Bill? He’s still around.

— Alan

He’s made 6 posts in the last month, one of which was “lol” and one of which was in the Brian Rucker memorial thread. And, actually, three others had a cumulative total of 18 words.

I like to think there’s a little bill in all of our hearts.

With a 10K lead, you could quit cold turkey today and still probably be number one almost five years from now. Combine that with the fact that you’re still a prolific poster, and I don’t think anyone’s catching you for a decade at least.

Yeah I know. But he doesn’t post enough.

There’s a wee part of me that sees this as a challenge.

It’s a dumb challenge, because incrementing a post count number isn’t a meaningful metric. Any numpty can do that.

Posting umpteen thousand useful, relevant, interesting posts – now that would be a meaningful challenge.

Shame there’s no way to measure that in this software.

Are you referring to the use of “like” additions to forum software by the last remark? I’m not sure that would ever qualify posts, only that someone else likes it, be it for its clever insightfullness, meanspiritness, shortness or whathavewe.

I know! I’m living proof of that. beams proudly

No, I don’t think he was using sarcasm to suggest that such things exist or that “likes” and “reputation” are valuable forum software additions. Rather, he’s suggesting that someone can achieve a large post count without ever saying anything meaningful.

FIGHTIN WORDS

He has been thinking about the subject recently and in more depth than a like button.