A majority (53%) of Republicans need to be shot into the Sun.

I would argue to shoot for even greater economies of scale.

Everyone’s focusing on teh 53% of Republicans, but the 22% of Independents agreeing is what terrifies me.

Those R leaning and/or Trump approving independents have been there for awhile.

image

aka “racists too lazy to register for a party”

If anything 22% is lower than I expected.

We could view this as the “core support” floor, really. If R, D, and I are roughly evenly split in the voting population, then this would say that at least 23% of voters (everyone who took Trump over Lincoln) would support Trump if he personally shot their neighbors.

That said, I’m more scared by the number of people who think each individual abuse is “inappropriate” but will vote for him anyway because the Demonrats want the government to pay for illegal immigrants to be able to get abortions in the men’s bathroom.

That 22% is pretty close to the “crazification level” that is simply part of the background radiation of the human race. That is, if you take some random, amazingly obviously-wrong idea and put it to a group of 100 humans, something like 27% will believe it is true.

So that’s what you are seeing with those Independents. The question to ask is why is the number so low? And the answer is


Membership in the Republican party itself (29%) is pretty close to the crazification level, so when you look at at 53% number, you’re really seeing small gradients in the self-selected crazy.

Is there a source for that 27%? I have no doubt that there is non-zero support for virtually any idea, but I’ve seen polls where, say, Congress is at 13%.

Not really – it’s an Internet Adage like Godwin’s Law or whatever.

It apparently has its origins in the 2004 Senate election in Illinois.

Obama vs. Alan Keyes. Keyes was from out of state, so you can eliminate any established political base; both candidates were black, so you can factor out racism; and Keyes was plainly, obviously, completely crazy. Batshit crazy. Head-trauma crazy. But 27% of the population of Illinois voted for him.[5] They put party identification, personal prejudice, whatever ahead of rational judgement. Hell, even like 5% of Democrats voted for him. That’s crazy behaviour. I think you have to assume a 27% crazification factor in any population.[2]

Between Leverage and the “crazification factor”, I think Mr. Rogers has cemented a worthy place in history.

Devin Nunes has had a rough go of it lately. He simply will not stop getting himself into situations where he comes out looking like a loser. Some of you may be asking, “but how could he come out looking any differently,” to which I guess I would reply, “he can’t.” Nunes should probably just retire now because after suing an imaginary cow on Twitter, he’s only gone downhill.

In 1920, 43 percent of Americans were members of a church; by 1960, that figure had jumped to 63 percent. In 1976, the year that evangelical Sunday school teacher Jimmy Carter was elected president, fundamentalist pastor Jerry Falwell decided it was time to stoop to worldly matters and go on a series of “I Love America” rallies across the country to decry the decline of American morality.

What constituted that decline, in Falwell’s mind, was the 1971 case Green v. Connally, which had determined that “racially discriminatory private schools are not entitled to the federal tax exemption.” Falwell had founded just such an institution, Lynchburg Christian School, and believing in his God-given American right to exclude African Americans, he teamed up with Paul Weyrich, a religious political activist and co-founder of the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, who had long been searching for an issue around which to forge a Christian voting bloc. Together, they reframed the debate, creating a playbook for a defense of white supremacy. “Weyrich’s genius lay in recognizing that he was unlikely to organize a mass movement around the defense of racial segregation,” argues Randall Balmer, an Episcopal priest and historian of American religion at Dartmouth College. “That would be a tough sell. With a sleight of hand, he recast the issue as a defense of religious liberty.”


I’m not sure exactly when my family got the idea that we were at war with larger American culture. But I know that at some point our lessons about God’s love became peppered with the idea that we were engaged in spiritual warfare, inhabiting a world where dark forces were constantly attempting to sever us from the will of God. The devil was real, and he was at work through “gay” Teletubbies and pagan Smurfs, through Dungeons & Dragons, through the horrors of MTV. At one point, my parents forbade TV altogether, and disconnected the stereo system in my car. We still loved Uncle Robert, but believed that the AIDS he’d contracted was a plague sent by God, just as we believed that abortion was our national sin, for which the country would likewise be held accountable. We awaited the Rapture, when Christians would be spirited away and Jesus would return to deal (violently) with the mess humans had made of things. Over time, and even before the introduction of Fox News, whatever nuance we might have seen in the culture evaporated into a stark polarity.

Zooming out, that cleaving was by design: It created a powerful us-versus-them mentality that mobilized the Christian base fiscally and politically. We were Christian soldiers, and the weapons we had were our votes and our tithes. “The persecution trope is a hell of a fundraising pitch,” says Charles Marsh, a professor of religious studies at the University of Virginia. “For evangelical activists and leaders, many of whom run nonprofits or rely on charitable contributions, that is the most direct and successful way to captivate conservative Christians.”


In his promises to Christians and his overt nationalism, Trump uniquely equated American salvation with American exceptionalism, asserting that to be great “again,” America had to come down on the right side of those very wedge issues that the religious right felt would be their reckoning. Even more, he affirmed and evangelized the belief that it is not only acceptable but actually advisable to grant cultural dominance to one particular religious group. “The white nationalism of fundamentalism was sleeping there like a latent gene, and it just came roaring back with a vengeance,” says Thornbury. In Trump’s America, “ ‘religious liberty’ is code for protection of white, Western cultural heritage.”

By creating a narrative of an evil “deep state” and casting himself — a powerful white man of immense generational wealth — as a victim in his own right, Trump not only tapped into the religious right’s familiar feeling of persecution, but he also cast himself as its savior, a man of flesh who would fight the holy war on its behalf. “There’s been a real determined effort by the left to try to separate Trump from his evangelical base by shaming them into, ‘How can you support a guy like this?’ ” Jeffress tells me. “Nobody’s confused. People don’t care really about the personality of a warrior; they want him to win the fight.” And Trump’s coming to that fight with a firebrand’s feeling, turning the political stage into an ecstatic experience — a conversion moment of sorts — and the average white evangelical into an acolyte, someone who would attend rallies with the fever of revivals, listen to speeches as if they were sermons, display their faithfulness with MAGA hats, send in money as if tithing, and metaphorically bow down, again and again, at the altar of Donald Trump, who delivers the nation from its transgressions.


“As Christians, do you feel like you’re under attack in this country?” I ask.

“Yes,” my mom says adamantly.

“When did you start feeling that way?”

“The day that Obama put the rainbow colors in the White House was a sad day for America,” my aunt replies. “That was a slap in God’s face. Abortion was a slap in his face, and here we’ve killed 60 million babies since 1973. I believe we’re going to be judged. I believe we are being judged.”

“Genesis gives you the description of how God wanted life to go,” my mom says. “It gives you the Scripture.”

“It also says that light was created and then the sun several days later,” I point out.

My mom frowns. “Are you going to say that you know how the world was created more than God?”

Yeah this seems familiar, exactly the kind of thing you and I were describing the other day.

While my parents never disconnected the car stereo, that’s only a step or two removed from what they did. And while that never happened to me, I know people it did happen to growing up.

Day two of the Revolution: Introduce breeding licences with examinations and tests involving critical thinking

I know you’re joking, but wouldn’t that replace one fascism with another?

That article inspires me to post a link to one of my favorite pieces of batshittery:

In this spiritual warfare manual, Dr. Brown writes from seven years’ experience helping deliver many, many people out of hardcore satanism. In this sequel to Dr. Brown’s best-selling book He Came to Set the Captives Free, you will learn to:

Stand victoriously against Satan.
Deal with the dangerous New Age teachings.
Recognize and deal with satanic ritualistic abuse of children.
Minister in the area of deliverance.
Handle the rarely discussed problems people face after deliverance.

Yeah, pretty much.

The ARM is the police force of the United Nations. ARM originated as an acronym for “Amalgamation of Regional Militia”, though this is not a term in current usage by the time of the Known Space novels. An agent of the ARM, Gil Hamilton, is the protagonist of Niven’s sci-fi detective stories, a series-within-a-series gathered in the collection Flatlander.

Their basic function is to enforce mandatory birth control on overcrowded Earth, and restrict research which might lead to dangerous weapons. In short, the ARM hunts down women who have illegal pregnancies and suppresses all new technologies. They also hunt organleggers, especially in the era of the “organ bank problem”. Among the many technologies they control and outlaw are all trained forms of armed and unarmed combat. By the 25th century, ARM agents were kept in an artificially induced state of paranoid schizophrenia to enhance their usefulness as law enforcement officials, which led to them sometimes being referred to as “Schizes”. Agents with natural tendencies toward paranoia were medicated into docility during their off duty hours, through the aforementioned science of psychistry

Yeah, but the correct fascism. :)