I 100% guarantee you that MTG will not care about one word written here, nor will any of her supporters.

Imagine being emasculaTed in such a fashion by, of all people, Tucker fucking Carlson.

Ted Cruz is afraid of this:

Only 10th level ideologues get to wear polka dotted bow ties.

To be fair there’s a bit of an American-Pyscho-In-A-Bowtie vibe going on there.

I disagree.
Carlson has a smarmy rich boy look. He’s cocky, but I bet he’s never been punched in the face in his entire life.

I am utterly unafraid of Carlson in any way. He’s by no means a dumb man, but he’s also not a genius. He’s certainly not strong in any way.

So that’s what he looks like when he doesn’t need to shit? Somebody give the man an enema.

Another GOP rapist:

So he molested some girl when she was a kid, and then that girl MARRIED HIS BROTHER?

Dude, these people are weird.

Their golden idol lusts after his daughter, so no surprise.

That’s what he looked like twenty years ago during Crossfire, before he took the hard right turn. Jon Stewart cast “Mortify Morality” on him and he turned into the bloated moron he is today.

So… What was Ted Cruz’s angle with the “terrorist” comment?

Seems like it could be:

  1. He sincerely thinks the riot at the capitol was a right-wing terrorist action, but then lost his nerve for defending that statement on Tucker.
  2. He legitimately misspoke and meant only to apply this label to the people who assaulted cops, as he claimed on Tucker. (yeah right)
  3. He is trying to discredit Trump and Trumpists and/or appeal to anti-Trumpists to prepare the way for a presidential run, and then denying it on Tucker was just cynically trying to thread the needle.
  4. Nonsense just flies out of his mouth on the Senate floor, who knows what he was thinking.
  5. Something else?

Yeah, but he might have an entourage of violent beefcake fed on a diet of fish sticks and steroids to do the punching for him!

Well that’s just disappointing, Craig. I feel like mocking Tucker’s constipated face is beneath the standards of Qt3. We should reserve our commentary to high-brow refutation of his various political positions and logical fallacies in statements he makes on his television show. I just don’t feel comfortable insulting a man for last achieving a successful bowel movement during the Clinton administration. Shame on you. Shame on youuuuuuuu!

Here’s Ted Cruz’s angle:
He has condemned the terrorism that took place on Jan 6, because this is obviously the best take from a broad, electoral perspective. Excusing insurrectionists is not a viable electoral strategy, and will only appeal to the crackpot far right (i.e. the Trumpists).

However, doing this alienated the Trumpists, because they are themselves terrorists and insurrectionists. Cruz is afraid to stand up to them, so he then cowered and groveled, begging for forgiveness.

This is the problem that the GOP has now. Their base is incompatible with a broad electoral victory. You can’t get support from the majority of Americans, and ALSO the GOP base, because they are diametrically opposed in fairly fundamental components of their ideology and indeed even their perceptions of reality.

They’re struggling with how to deal with this. Some more traditional members of the GOP are fruitlessly trying to walk this line between the two, but it simply does not work, and that’s where Cruz is now…and he’s getting raked over the coals for it.

In some ways, the Trumpist base is actually more rational, in that they aren’t even trying to combine these two incompatible versions of reality. They’re just going all in with their fantasy version. While this is an incorrect view of reality, and thus doomed to failure, it’s at least internally consistent in some weird way.

Since they aren’t trying to reconcile their stuff with a reality that is perceived by society at large, to achieve electoral victories they are left with the choice we see them going for… just stop the majority from voting at all.

So, anyway, all that aside, Cruz is a piece of shit and a coward who is trying to appeal to two incompatible views of reality, because he lacks the spine to take a position and defend it.

This.

Citation needed.

(I kid, but given gerrymandering, there are definitely places where it appears to be viable.)

Yeah, that seems the most likely. Honestly, though, it seems like there’s little benefit for a cynical Republican piece of shit to say anything strongly critical of Jan 6 at this time. How many 2024 swing voters are waiting to see what Ted Cruz has to say on this topic today? Why not bide your time and repudiate it later, if you (a cynical Republican piece of shit) make it to the general election?

Here’s my other question: Does Tucker’s attack on Cruz amount to “Tucker presidential run: confirmed”?

Texas GOP: If some things are bad, why can’t we make more things bad?