I think barring ex-felons from voting is bullshit to begin with. If you did your time, then you did your time. And these are folks who would bring an insight to the criminal justice system that is lacking in our electorate.
abrandt
15003
Iâm not sure how itâs even constitutional to be able to permanently disenfranchise someone like that.
The more Iâve considered the issue over the year the less I feel like there is even justification for stripping someoneâs right to vote while they are still in prison, even.
There isnât any explicit, underlying right to vote in the Constitution. There are amendments which prevent denying the vote on the basis of certain things (race, gender, age, and failure / inability to pay taxes) but pretty much anything else seems to be fair game. And itâs worth noting that all those amendments are post-Civil War amendments, which means that the right doesnât believe in them anyway.
Zylon
15005
Considering their base and their leadership, youâd think Republicans would be all in on allowing felons to vote.
ShivaX
15006
They generally are. As long as they think theyâll vote the right way.
Itâs an explicitly racial Jim Crow relic which wasnât addressed in the Civil Rights Act.
Couple of jerkwads in The Villages voted twice and got slapped on the wrists. They knowingly committed fraud and the state does nothing. They may give jail time to these people who mistakenly voted with no intention of committing fraud.
Not sure if these âthousand wordsâ regarding the GOP and Inflation has been posted yet:

vyshka
15011
And Durham apparently strikes out in court.
Man, these idiots:
Durham lost the case on purpose! Itâs all part of the RICO plan!
Menzo
15013
Thatâs whatâs known as the âRocky III Strategy.â Let your opponent tire himself out punching you, then you have him right where you want him!
Pyperkub
15014
More along the lines of this (follow the money - ALWAYS follow the moneyâŠ)
Durham and his team did quite well off of the taxpayers in this GOP bit of partisan cr*pâŠ
Scotten
15016
âMAGA never loses. Everything is unjustly stolen from themâ
Why does this guy get to exist under Garland?
Sharpe
15018
That is a good question to which there is a long technical answer, but in reality, itâs b/c Garland is a severe disappointment. Even if Garland eventually indicts Trump (Iâm not holding my breath) his passivity and tolerance of partisan corruption by Trump/Barr legacies has already weakened the DOJ in a substantial way. He may still do some good but as of now, heâs been an extremely ineffective AG in regard to the most important issues. Iâm saddened; I expected better.
Appointed under Trump and Barr