Three reviews of Netflix shows that you probably should not watch. They seem appropriate to deal with as a unit, given their similarities with 1) being in German, 2) having unlikeable characters, and 3) intrigue based on technobabble.
Biohackers is pretty awful, I only soldiered through it for German practice. It’s supposed to be a thriller around a girl with a mysterious past, who enters the university to study bioinformatics but has a secret agenda. Every character is unlikeable, people keep betraying or pretending to betray each other, and everything they do with the bioinformatics hook is just absurd (amatereurs doing gene manipulation miracles in their home lab, the most unbelievable introductory university courses you can imagine, a vapid biohacker influencer storyline, etc).
At least it’s short, at two seasons of six episodes each.
How to sell drugs online (fast) is even worse, I couldn’t stomach more than one season of this tripe even as language training. It’s basically “what if Breaking Bad, but the main character was a high school student with no skills”. The main character is unlikeable beyond belief, the creators totally seemed to have missed that Breaking Bad worked because the audience was fooled into rooting for Walter White to start with, and then boiled like a frog. Here you’d not spit on the main character if they were on fire.
Everything about the drug enterprise is incredibly stupid. The ascent from selling a handful of pills to a drug kingpin is really fast, completely unjustified, and with opsec that’d get the guy arrested in a month. (Of course, like in Breaking Bad, a family member is the cop.)
The Billion Dollar Code should have worked for me. It’s a startup story combined with an authentically grimy feeling early '90s Berlin, which is the second sexiest possible setting for any piece of media (after late '80s cold war Berlin). And unlike the other two, here the performances were solid and believable, and the technobabble actually made sense thanks to this being based on a real story.
Where the show runs into problems is that the show is telling a story of naive hacker heroes in the euro-periphery whose work gets exploited by evil Silicon Valley big tech. In reality the guys were scumbag patent trolls. They wrote a program, got a patent for something that should not have been patented, and then did nothing with the program or the patent for a decade until they found some fat pockets to shake down. The show tries to make them look sympathetic by compressing the timeline to something more like two years, but that just doesn’t work; the implication ends up being that Google Earth was released in 1995, and the cognitive dissonance is too much. It’s just clear that there’s a decade long timeskip and that if they were going to do anything more than an art installation, it would have happened.
(And then looking under the hood of the real story, it turns out that basically everything else around this theme was fabricated too. E.g. it was the Germans who sent a patent shakedown letter to Google, when the show claims that the contact was the other way around and Google was going around small companies asking for prices on their patents for some kind of a “hahaa, you stated a small number and now you’ll never be able to recover damages” catch-22. )
I think I would have liked this if they’d just used a fictional big tech co, and it would have been easier to pretend that the timeline worked. And the main charaters would infact have been heroes, rather than scum. But I realize this is a very “me” problem, others might not react that badly to the inconsistency or patent trolls.