rowe33
21
If scottagibson reports my loyalty correctly then I’ll give him Strong Leader but I wanted to make sure before I officially play it.
My fellow Knights of the Round Table, I’m happy to report that Sir Rowe is a loyal knight of the King, Good and True.
rowe33
23
Yay, ok, moving on, like I said I’ll give the Strong Leader card to scott and the No Confidence to robthomasson. That card goes to rob as he’s 3rd in line but I’m not bringing him because scott at least told the truth.
I’ll nominate this party for the first quest:
rowe33
Christien (since he’s next in line)
scottagibson (assuming he’s Good for now)
fire
24
sscottagibson holds Strong Leader
robthomasson holds No Confidence
Now accepting all votes for the following quest (1a):
rowe33 (team leader), Christien Murawski, scottagibson.
This choice of party makes good sense to me. There are two known good members - rowe33 and me. At least I know they’re good. We have a fair chance for a quick success, and if there is a failure, we’ll know it was Christien who failed it. I think we should vote ‘Yea’ for the early lead!
Egad but verily I veel giddily gifted.
I am - of course - but a Loyal Servant of Arthur. Again. So I expected to spend my time knitting some armour in case I got stabbed. Again. It seems the yon false Knights perceive my perspicacity as Merlinicity.
But now I’ve got a card for the first time! Huzzah! Mead me up wenches! I am going to vote YES to every team until I get a chance to use it!!!
Okay. That’s not true. It was mead manifested mumbling madness. I will be steadfast and sure. Again.
Good team choice given the card distribution, rowe!
clyve
29
holy smokes! I just checked that image out for the first time on PC instead of through tapatalk and its HUGE! Sorry guys :P
I’m normally pretty hesitant to vote YES in this game but I feel like rowe has picked a pretty logical team… I’m thinking still.
If lantz were here he would have told you off for not giving ME that Strong Leader, but I understand your decision :P
Can you remake your chart using http://bayeux.datensalat.net/ ?
Nikolaj
31
I’ll be voting yea for this quest to proceed, I think. I still question the value of voting no for information since the information gained tends to not be all that useful, in my opinion, and it makes my brain hurt. I think Rowe’s reasoning is sound, so let’s do it and see what’s what.
fire
32
Just a reminder to vote for Quest 1a team: rowe33 (Team Leader), Christien Murawski, and scottagibson.
We’re half an hour from calling time and I’m still missing 4 votes. I’ll extend the time by a couple hours, but then will have to call it.
rowe33
34
I was originally going to give it to you for the usual reasons but it just made more sense to give it to the only person I’ve verified has done something Good-ish. I thought about NC to scott and SL to you also but SL is the stronger card I think.
Blips
37
This quest has my vote to go ahead, as we have no information yet to make me question the loyalty of the team.
Why is nobody questioning the fact that rowe chose to establish confidence with somebody random in the middle of the list? That seems strange to me.
-xtien
As opposed to what? Choose somebody at random at the end of the list? Me, I’d roll a die. What else can you do at the beginning of the game?
But, I’m glad you’re concerned. Makes me think you’re good, and that bodes well for the quest.
You’re right on all counts, I suppose. But he changed his mind to you for some reason, after making his choice. It just seems weird, and I wondered why nobody said anything about it heretofore (I’m just catching up on the thread this morning).
-xtien
