Well, it’s plain English. I mean, you just posted your longest screed of the match, in which you said, essentially, ‘maybe’, then said this was an explanation of your thinking about the vote!
I mean: once the team vote is in, we look at it. If it is rejected, we move on. If it is approved but we don’t like the votes, we NC it.
This playing the dunce is hardly credible, Kl3mnop. If Blips were evil, why would he distribute cards the way he did? If he were evil, why would he agree to send a previously successful team when good are up 2-0?
Oooh, you didn’t say anything about No Confidence, so I was missing that part. I totally understand. And also agree!
Not playing anything. Nor have I made any assertion of anyone’s GOODness or EVILness as you and rowe33 and jostly seem to like to do at every turn (except clyve, who I have seen is GOOD.)
I just find it awesome how the three of you are pushing everyone around, basically calling the peasants EVIL…and they still rush to do your bidding. After which they get your backhanded approval.
Yes, this is the curious incident of the dog in the night-time, isn’t it?
rowe33
686
Just turn the Kl3m channel off, scott - it’s pretty obvious he’s Evil and just doing his usual thing.
Going to vote yes on this party as well - if Blips is Evil then he would have had no choice but to give those cards to fellow Evil as they’re down 0-2. I’m confident we have a Good foursome from quest 2 so in the very small chance that Blips’ party were to Fail, we’d certainly know it’s him. And I believe we have two Eye cards also so we’d be able to check two people if necessary.
A) This is an ultra-convenient cover for Quest 3 to fail and to auto-blame Blips. Poor Blips.
B) Extra convenient that the next pre-proposed team would include essentially the same members…no reason to shake things up, right? What’s one failure? No biggie!
C) Still holding out for an explanation of how you arrived so neatly at your 6 GOOD / 4 EVIL list? Especially how it is that Dave/x-tien get marked EVIL as a direct result of clyve being GOOD. Because if I am EVIL then you’re going to have to come up with a pretty neat story about how clyve is so clearly GOOD.
All I’d ask for at this point is that the people that have been repeatedly put down by rowe33, scottagibson and jostly step back and look at the totality of what has transpired thus far.
jostly
688
Two out of two successful missions? I can happily accept having that track record to my name. :)
rowe33
689
I will say that it’d be interesting to see you actually play a Good knight one of these games. I’d say you’ve been cursed with 3 games in a row of being Evil but you certainly seem to enjoy the role! :D
To the Good knights, if you don’t trust Blips or you think I somehow manipulated Blips into NOT putting up the party that just succeeded quest 2 for his turn just so that I could then lay blame at his feet when I throw off my cloak of Goodness and reveal myself to be true Evil by failing quest 3 after voting Success for two quests in a row, putting my Evil squad down 0-2 for some reason (I guess to make a dramatic Evil comeback) then feel free to vote this down and we’ll win with the quest 2 party. We’ve got this won either way. I believe Kl3m’s Razor points to this dastardly incredibly complicated plan being the likely scenario.
Well, that might be nice spin.
I would imagine that one of the challenges of getting multiple EVIL onto the same team is the coordination of the votes. Especially when there’s a Keeping An Eye On You hanging over your head.
@rowe33
I will entirely shut up if you will only explain how clyve made your GOOD list. Just anything. Any tangible response whatsoever. And I will shut up. Knight’s Honor.
You have now made +10 responses to me since you posted your list…and never once even attempted to address the simple question.
This goes entirely to your credibility of naming GOOD/EVIL. You clearly named Dave/x-tien as EVIL, no doubt. Based entirely on who you could eliminate because they were GOOD, including clyve.
I have tried to work through the scenarios and there just isn’t any way that…well, let’s just say that there are some massive inconsistencies that need to be explained which go directly to proving my allegiance.
So this is an important question (to me.)
I don’t think we’ve got anything to recommend clyve except that he voted Yes on scott’s team that succeeded. (Clyve did vote No on annie’s team, which also succeeded.)
Altogether weak evidence for anything.
I hope that what I just said doesn’t make me sound FUCKING NUTSO.
:D
jostly
694
I think the fact that kl3m is so adamantly trying to procure evidence for the claim that clyve is good - and by extension implying that he’s not - is a good reason to trust clyve. :)
I don’t pay any attention to that sort of thing but I think it’s good that someone does!
clyve
696
It doesn’t even matter if I’m on the team now anyways… Why wouldn’t we just use the same ol’ gang again?
I am not trying to procure evidence of anything. I only wish for rowe33 to provide an explanation for why he listed clyve amongst the GOOD in his unsolicited list…thereby allowing him to (conveniently) place Dave and x-tien into the EVIL list with no additional explanation other than “all the available GOOD slots are taken, therefore Dave and x-tien must be EVIL.”
clyve is GOOD. I have seen his card. This is what makes it especially interesting that rowe33 would place clyve into the GOOD bin when he so clearly sees me as EVIL. Which then allows him to put Dave and x-tien into the EVIL bin without any evidence/explanation whatsoever.
rowe33 is far too savvy to just make a mistake. This was calculated.
rowe33
698
I’m seriously confused why it matters if I reply or not…if we fail this next quest and no cards prove who failed it then I’ll give you my reasoning - I promise. Until then, why would I explain it to Evil? I should never have fed the troll and I apologize to fellow Good for that. I like making educated guesses on the loyalties of everyone so I can go back later and see how right or wrong I was.
It literally DOES NOT MATTER what I think of anyone except the party from quest 2. If Blips would have put that party up for vote then we wouldn’t even be having any of these discussions. Good would have voted them in, we all would have (shockingly, I know!) voted Success again and Good would win 3-0.
rowe33
699
A great point and I hope you don’t mind when I quote you in the extremely unlikely event our next quest fails and I explain my madness to Ser Klem.
@rowe
Clearly you will refuse to address the question. I guess that’s what I’ll get. Too bad nobody else cares.
You offered a list. You made some unequivocal statements of allegiance. You included some (badly) flawed logical conclusions. You are a calculated player. Now it doesn’t matter. Got it!
Alright, Lemmings! Off with you on your merry jaunt!
