This is the sort of thing that made me put you on ignore before.
I think that’s called empathy :)
It’s hard to find good sources on this war. My favorite is Lt General Ben Hodges, whose previous posts include Commanding General, US Army Europe. He’s very optimistic about the likely outcomes, and he is not one to mince words. Here is his latest:
Grifman
20223
In the last 24 hours Russia has lost about half of the territory they held north of the Dnipro:
This looks less like a planned phased withdrawal and more like a rout.
Occam’s razor says that Russia would spend real money trying to influence QT3? Seriously?
Strollen
20226
Who says social media is increasing polarization and division? Even dog lovers have to like that one.
KevinC
20227
14 minute segment on the ongoing liberation of Kherson. I found the interviews that start around the 4:09 mark to be pretty moving. Especially regarding everyday bravery like Yulia, a woman who stayed behind in her occupied village to lead it during occupation after the mayor fled.
It does make me dread what we’ll learn about the Kherson city occupation once it’s back under Ukraine’s control.
Grifman
20230
The Russians have dropped the bridge:
meeper
20231
I disagree. To me, what it looks like is that all the reports over the last few weeks of Russians abandoning Kherson have been accurate and not a ruse.
No doubt they left a significant number of recent conscripts and other low-value troops to ‘hold the line’, but I think any units they wanted tout of Kherson were over the river before that little play that Shoigu and cast was broadcast.
Grifman
20232
I agree with you now after seeing more info this morning. The Russians seemed to have gotten across with at least most of their troops, not sure about the equipment. I think prior reports of great losses were exaggerated.
The Russian MOD has announced that their withdrawal is complete:
Regardless of how it ended, it is still a great victory for Ukraine.
meeper
20233
It’s certainly good and necessary news. I’m a little concerned about what this may mean for allied support for the Ukrainian side though. I know there’s been a lot of chatter about how the ‘Ukrainians need to show a victory’ and such, but I’m really worried that a number of allies are going to start saying, ‘okay, you’ve taken back a lot. Maybe that’s as far as you go.’
Lurb
20234
I think the incentive to go back to the February situation is still strong, Russia gets taught a full “all this for naught” lesson and everything is back to a situation that many perceived as stable.
When it’s just Crimea and the Donbass in Russian hands I guess the pressure to settle will come hard.
spiffy
20235
That doesn’t mean Ukraine can’t shut the water off to Crimea, drop what’s left of the bridge and sink Russia’s ferry first…
meeper
20236
If I’m Ukraine, I keep the water on (at least initially) and say, “see, we aren’t terrorists like Russia.”
abrandt
20237
I sure hope that’s not true, at least not for the majority of nations supporting Ukraine. That feels like it’s just asking for this conflict to erupt into war again in the future.
It’s a very posh razor, you see, lots of Saudi oil money behind it!
Indeed. The only long-term security for Ukraine worth a damn is NATO membership or regime change in Russia, or both.
Ex-SWoo
20239
Even if Ukraine can’t get back to Feb borders I think realistically they’ll need take back enough to break the land bridge between Crimea and the Donbas to make it feel like a proper win.
That’ll mean recovering most of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts as a bare minimum.