Still reading and digesting the RUSI report, here talking about the VKS - the Russians air force:

Ukrainian assessments concluded that given limited flight hours and the practice of training being delivered in units, the VKS entered the conflict with fewer than 100 fully trained and current pilots.

WTF? I think I would have dismissed this out of hand before the war, but it certainly explains the complete failure to achieve air superiority which I don’t think anyone was predicting in advance.

(Also, that story isn’t just one of Russian failure. The report also covers how Ukraine invested a lot into building up its air defences pre-war, kept most of its assets alive through the initial strikes, and reconstituted them into a properly integrated air defence network that has made Ukrainian airspace too dangerous for the VKS, and while doing that can also shoot down two thirds of incoming cruise missiles.)

Combined with a military culture that assigns the most dangerous missions to the most experienced crews, attrition in the VKS has fallen disproportionately on this cadre, reducing the overall effectiveness of the force and its ability to train new pilots. In negotiations over prisoner exchanges, the AFRF have been eager for the return of experienced pilots. The mobilisation of trainers from their flying schools to frontline formations has also hampered the ability to generate new pilots.

Does nobody read history??

The Ukrainian military has noted a rise in both very young and very old pilots in the VKS, with ageing pilots returned to frontline service. This has corresponded with a significant reduction in the scale and complexity of VKS air operations over Ukraine since the beginning of the conflict. It is also a problem that has affected ground crews, for example with the discovery of left-on covers on the sensors of Russian aviation operating over Ukraine [ouch], an easily avoided mistake which has a severe impact on effectiveness and should be considered negligence. This suggests challenges in discipline and junior leadership among maintenance crews in the VKS. Another demonstration of this poor discipline in the VKS is the routine stacking of munitions next to aircraft on Russian air bases.

There has been a bunch of reporting, including from RUSI, that Russia’s long term investment in electronic warfare systems has mostly not paid off, because they’ve never really worked out how to avoid messing up their own systems.

fratricide is a systemic issue between Russian systems. For example, the Khibiny EW pod, mounted to a number of Russian aircraft, automatically detects radars and disrupts them. Unfortunately for the Russians, it tends to also do this to other Russian aircraft. Pairs of Russian strike aircraft mounting this system have therefore had to choose between having a functional radar or EW protection. They have often been ordered to prioritise their radar.

This is insane if true. But if they are recalling older veteran pilots . . .

It’s a huge bet to put green or retired pilots into very expensive military equipment. It really only takes a split second to be blown out of the sky.

It’s hard to seed recruits into veteran units the way you can do it with infantry.

Especially if the equipment itself wants to fuck you up.

It’s all not nice. For now it’s a secondary concern but I’m afraid what Ukraine will look like after they win.

Right now, for example, they show a complete lack of desire to understand Belarusian situation. All they do is appease the dictator and release propaganda videos aimed at Belarusians that show little comprehension. You’d expect a certain amount of xenophobia after what happens in Ukraine but you also want a stable future for the region and not a perpetual vendetta.

I read the other day the UK only has 33 pilots qualified to fly the F35 and some of those are borrowed from other countries.

Well, it’s a pretty new plane and I gather there are not all that many of them in service, especially outside the USA? But yeah, modern air combat requires such intensive training that you can’t really sustain any losses, as the time it takes to train people is far in excess of how long most wars are expected to last.

US intelligence reporting operations will remain at a lower level over winter.

However:
Ms Haines said US intelligence believes Russian President Vladimir Putin does not have a full picture at this stage of just how challenged his military are.
“We see shortages of ammunition, for morale, supply issues, logistics, a whole series of concerns that they’re facing.”

Or you have no stuff to fly with. “Oh, we ran out of ECM pods last week. We lost the last one when Ivan didn’t come back”.

What will be interesting is when Putin orders assaults when no one will tell the King they have no winter gear, ammunition, or fuel. I’m thinking that the assaults will still happen - without winter gear, ammunition or fuel.

Ok, I’m not anything like an expert on ordnance, far from it, but those look awfully intact. Are those rockets things that propel other payloads, and then fall out of the sky more or less in one piece?

Or the assaults will “happen”.

Yep. And I remember a senior RAF officer saying recently that it takes 8 years to train an RAF pilot.

The surprise came from the fact that the VKS has 1200+ active first line fighters, and 300+ based within reach of Ukraine. In that context, 100 fully qualified pilots is a bit disappointing. But maybe it’s also a hint that those other numbers are probably optimistic.

I so wish I could have been at this debate…

Now, I heavily support Car Bildt version, but I want to let you know, that Mearsheimers view of things is VERY much a thing in a lot of places…and he’s an American.

Mearsheimers view also includes a view that Russia is fighting an existential battle which kinda justifies their behavoir, and if that wins out, then the wests support to Ukraine will erode quick…

How on Earth can anyone believe Russia is fighting an existential battle? The only thing at stake is Putin’s future, not Russia’s.

JFC. I don’t know who that is, but he sounds precious.

Really. What war is he watching?

He’s a big shot political scientist at the University of Chicago. Considered one of the major leaders of the “realist” movement.

Russia is in no way fighting an existential battle. Putin is, not Russia.