I think that’s a fair distinction! I suppose I was looking at it from the angle of “additional compensation that is expected and practically required, even if not legally required, due to inadequate official compensation.”

Ah, gotcha, that’s a whole other ball of wax, and a correct one. The broad idea of the tipping world is extremely suspect and never more so than in the US where you can drastically underpay tipped employees way below minimum wage on the expectation of tips. I’ve done it, it sucks, and there’s a whole 'nother underlying hierarchy that keeps the newbies from being able to put food on the table until they kowtow to the scheme for years.

Can I just ask, WTF is wrong with Scholz?

While true, bribery is also often connected to avoiding things happening to you.

One goes into a place to eat in a tipping country knowing that the tip exists. And also that they don’t have to pay it, even if that makes them shitty people.

With bribery, well maybe that cop wants you to buy his lunch today. Now if you’re say smuggling weapons, the bribe is more a cost of business thing you’re happy to pay, but for a lot of people it’s just extortion.

Scholz is a schwanz.

I would say that the big difference between tipping and bribery is that generally in the case of bribery, you are paying someone who holds power over you, in order for them not to abuse their power.

Or, alternately, you are paying them to abuse their power in your favor.

That makes it pretty different from tipping, to me.

If someone is simply doing their job, as defined by their society and laws, then bribery isn’t really a thing.

If bribery is widespread, then that means there is systemic corruption, and I think we can evaluate that in a pretty universal, objective manner, because it’s essentially people paying to go around the rules that society had set up for itself.

Inequality can be measured in different ways. Sure by American standards almost everybody in the Soviet Union was poor. The top .01% in the USSR, didn’t have jets, yachts and only 3 or 4 modest size houses. But the huge inequality in the Soviet Union, wasn’t material inequality but power. I’m less likely to be shot, or thrown in jail on BS charges than young black man, but not significantly different than someone with 1/10 or 10x my wealth. Crossing a midlevel KGB, cop, or high-ranking politburo member was dangerous because of the huge power imbalances.

Besides being billionaires Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, and Mark Benioff share one thing in common, their plans for their Hawaii properties have been stymied by local citizen groups and neighborhood boards for years. It is hard to imagine the head of major factory or a politburo member facing a similar problem in the Soviet Union, or Russia today.

There’s a lot of energy being spent here on likening the Putin regime to the Soviet regime, and I don’t really know why. It’s true they’re both authoritarian and — in their own different ways — corrupt, but otherwise they’re very different. The Putin regime seems much more like the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to me than like the USSR.

I think that’s either extortion when it’s avoiding a bad action, or blackmail when it’s avoiding bad information.

image

Given that Putin’s biggest regret is the collapse of the Soviet Union and his stated goal is to restore Russia’s status as a superpower the comparison seems pretty logical to me. Why do you think Saudi Arabia is a better comparison?

Bribery is an inducement to get someone to do something that they shouldn’t and would not do otherwise, and often benefits the person offering the bribe at the expense that those who do not bribe (such as bidding for a contract).

Tipping is thanking someone monetarily for their providing good service after the fact. The tipper and non-tipper and in the same position benefit wise because the tipping is after the fact.

Very different.

Like I said, heavy losses:

Most of those tanks look like they were abandoned.

February and abandoned Russian armored vehicles, name a more iconic duo.

Ukrainian tractors and Russian tanks?

Why are all those tanks so close together? That looks like the videogame RTS version of the war. Maybe CoH?

Presumably because they weren’t destroyed in the field of battle, but rather parked at a base/camp/depot/etc that got targeted by arty or missiles or airstrikes.

No @Tortilla they were caught in artillery strike and condensed.