The Abraham-Lincoln brigade was pretty successful in the Spanish-Civil despite being almost entirely English speaking, and the larger International Brigade had lots of languages. I’m guessing that most if not all international brigade will use English, don’t pretty much all Swedish people speak at least basic English. It seems that most educated Ukrainians also have decent English languages.

FYI, The British army in WWII had battalion plus size units of dozens of language.

There is in pravda in Izvestia, and no izvestia in Pravda.”
(’There is no truth in news, and no news in truth."

Reading about Molotov Cocktails on wikipedia, I always knew the Finns came up with the name during the Winter War but didn’t realise its connected to a great joke:

So apparently THIS happened

What is the record for quickest completion to membership in NATO? Under circumstances I imagine it would be pretty much immediate.

He is fucking completely deranged.

Madnan. Russian warship, go fuck yourself.

But what does that even mean?

Here’s an article from a month ago suggesting this has already happened at least once:

Uh… do those reports also mention that the letter was sent in late January, and reported on a month ago?

Twitter is not a medium for information that allows for any context or critical thinking. I am really considering going back to only news sites to learn about war developments, even if it leaves me a couple of hours behind.

Twitter is fine as long as you know what it is - talk. Which is cheap. But not completely worthless…
The OSINT twitter feeds that I trust have been generally good at providing timely, filtered, information with some context. 90% of the time it proves accurate - and sometimes things get retracted. About as good as anything gets now-a-days.

For some reason, since Putin has taken over, US President have paralyzed to risk any confrontation with Putin, even though Russia is in far weaker position, than it was from roughly 1955-1990, conventional forces, economically, and far more diplomatically isolated. In addition, instead of looking at 10,000 warhead that both sides pre SALT, each side is limited to 1550 warheads, and neither has even 1,500 warheads. Now don’t get me wrong 1,500 nukes is enough to seriously fuck up each other countries, but it is NOT enough kill everyone, much less end life on the planet.

A few example
JFK- Had the Bay of Pigs, Cuban Blockade, 1st Inaugural speech
Nixon: Invasion/bombing of Cambodia/Laos, Mining of harbors in North Vietnam, Opening up China
Reagan: Starwars defense, basing of intermediate missiles in Europe, Evil Empire speech, Invasion of Grenada, Iran/Contra
Bush 41: Retaking of Kuwait, Iraq No Fly Zones
Clinton: Missile strikes at Iraq, intervention in the Balkan, NATO expansion
Russia also engage in at least as many provocative actions
In poker terms, Russia would do something threaten, and rather than just responding (calling), the Americans would raise. The Russian would either raise/ or call. Then both sides would walk back from the brink.

Since, Putin has been power has been the West, has basically, ether folded or just called. The invasion of Iraq was an provocative as was the addition of the Baltic states in 2004. But other than that Putin has learned that there is no downside to do anything aggressive.

Yes, I know people will say what about sanctions? Well, in my lifetime I’ve seen diplomats talk about the “unprecedent, damaging, severe, devastating, wide ranging, crippling”, sanction imposed on Afghanistan, Angola, Argentina, Belarus, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cambodia, Chad, China, Colombia, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, and that’s just A-C. Other than South Africa, I’m really struggling to see a time when these sanctions convinced a country to change course. In the case of South Africa, I think the change had a lot more to do with Nelson Mandela than western sanctions.

Take Iran, the country has been under some form of sanctions since the Shaw was overthrown, access to SWIFT was shut down since 2012 . Yet, somehow despite these "pick your adjective " sanctions, it is still a functioning country, and people aren’t starving nor rioting in the street in number much larger than in the US.

There is actually a ton more we could do: real time intelligence, drones, no fly zones, volunteer brigades, cyberattacks But, all Putin has to do is trot out a meme.

And everyone say, we can’t doing anything cause WWIII will start.

Thanks. That is “Infantry wins battles, logistics wins wars” dictum proven true again.

It is a reasonable discussion to ponder where the line is…

For instance, a no-fly zone or drones to defend Ukraine from Russian forces is considered by many to be too risky, but many of the same people will say that it is necessary to go to all-out war with China to defend Taiwan or all-out war with Russia to defend Estonia?

Is a treaty all that matters (in which case, why Taiwan?), or is it number of people at stake, or whether the adversary threatens nukes?

Give me a choice between Putin in Kiev, and 3000 nukes flying, I’ll take Putin in Kiev, as would anyone sane.

All of these are possible odd rationalizations we could guess are in Putin’s mind, but nobody knows.

My theory, based on nothing whatsoever, is that he has/is having a health scare and this is his Gilgamesh moment. He is in the midst of his battle with Humbaba and after cruel militarily crushing Ukraine, shortly he will fall asleep while some snake eats his life weed.

This guy once actually gave advice to a president of the United States.

Yeah Sean, they’d never figure it out!

I mean… Would they?

The competence on display in the Ukraine is not high.

Honestly, how the fuck is Russia going to know if some of our long range drones take out a hundred tanks and support vehicles? We can practically bomb them from allied space with stand off weapons. For the first time I agree with Hannity.

Putin doesn’t want to die. No nukes will fly.

Little bit of dark humor