Hah!

Generally, I think Democrats — who strangely have the reputation of doing performative things! — don’t really do a great job of making proposals that can’t pass but have the potential effect of making them more popular in the process, if they just shout them from the rooftops loudly enough.

Despite Ukraine asking for jets, drones + portable AA seems better. I can see how Russia could make it impossible for Ukraine to field jets, but not small drones and portable AA.

All of whom will be out of a job within a week.

This is basically employees being forced to sit and listen to the CEO explain that, yes, he shutting down the company and laying them all off. But it’s all part of the grand plan to synergize backward overflow.

I believe the phrase is “engaged in a special operation to right-size the economy”.

For those not familiar with art, the mimicked painting is Reply of the Zaporozhian Cossacks

Russia grounding all international flights using aircraft leased from foreign owners. Which probably means all international flights, or nearly all.

Although the Russians don’t control the air completely, they still have air superiority over much of the country. What a no-fly zone would give Ukraine is the opportunity to strategically re-position their entrenched forced from the eastern part of the country. Right now, the Ukrainians can’t move in columns at all because of the possibility of air attack. This keeps the initiative with the Russians.

I do agree with the analysis linked above that-- now that a quick capitulation is off the table-- the Russians intend to encircle and destroy the Ukrainian forces in eastern Ukraine. Lack of a no-fly zone eliminates the Ukrainians best shot at avoiding that.

Article for the paywalled:

Summary

President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia on Saturday upped his rhetoric by describing the Western sanctions imposed against Russia since his military invasion of Ukraine as “akin to a declaration of war,” and warning that Ukraine might lose its statehood if its leaders continued to resist his military invasion of the country.

“The current leadership needs to understand that if they continue doing what they are doing, they risk the future of Ukrainian statehood,” he said at a meeting in Moscow on Saturday, in his first extended remarks since the start of the war. “If that happens,” he said, “they will have to be blamed for that.”

He made the comments during a meeting with female flight attendants from Russian airlines before International Women’s Day, which will be marked on Tuesday. Mr. Putin has often used such choreographed events to make high-profile statements.

In the remarks, Mr. Putin appeared to outline his military tactics, while threatening that any no-fly zone, as Ukrainian officials have called for in recent days, would have devastating consequences.

“Warehouses with weapons and ammunition, aviation, air defense systems — it takes time to destroy air defense systems,” the Russian leader said. “This work is practically done — that’s why there are demands to impose a no-fly zone. The realization of that demand would bring catastrophic results not only to Europe, but to the whole world.”

NATO leaders have resisted the calls for a no-fly zone, worried that implementing one could lead to a larger war.

Indeed, Mr. Putin suggested that such a measure could broaden the conflict.

“We hear calls to impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine,” he said. “It is impossible to do from Ukrainian territory — it can only be done from the territory of other states. But any moves in such direction will be seen by us as participation in an armed conflict by the country that will create threats to our servicemen.”

He reiterated his earlier points about the need to protect the Russian-speaking population in Ukraine’s East against nationalists and to avert Ukraine’s NATO accession.

He said that Russia was ready to withstand the sanctions imposed on his country since he began the invasion of Ukraine — calling the penalties “akin to a declaration of war” — and that Moscow’s demands had been made clear to the Ukrainians.

“Our proposals are on the table with the group of negotiators from Kyiv,” he said. “Hopefully, they will respond positively to that.”

Although rumors have swirled through Russia in recent days of impending martial law, conscription and closed borders because of the war, Mr. Putin stressed that Russia did not plan to impose martial law unless there was aggression against Russian territory.

He also vowed that conscription would not be an issue.

“Only professional military servicemen take part in this operation, officers and contract soldiers,” Mr. Putin said. “Not a single conscript takes part in it, and we don’t plan to send them there.”

And he expressed full confidence in his military’s ability to succeed in its task.

“Our army will solve all tasks — I don’t doubt it for a second,” Mr. Putin said. “This is confirmed by how the operation is ongoing. Everything is being done according to a plan, as the General Staff planned it.”

Quick refresher re attacking the Russian airforce and destroying their air defences:

The 2014 [the most recent, still in effect] version of the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation states,the Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the utilization of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and (or) its allies and also in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation involving the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is in jeopardy. (President of the Russian Federation, 2014, para. 27)

President Putin quoted this doctrine in a recent speech introducing new nuclear delivery systems, characterizing it approvingly as “concise, clear, and concrete” (Putin, 2018)

Source

My friend is a pilot of Aeroflot and he talks something incomprehensible about how it’s all going badly. They’re very overworked now cause people are fleeing the country. They also get a lot of help from Serbia (basically proxy air companies) but it’s not clear how long it will work.

Fun fact is also Aeroflot changing their pre-flight greetings. Previously there was a pompous speech about proud aviation traditions, now it’s official and straightforward.

I can’t find any actual reporting on this from outlets I’ve heard of before. The little I find from the last couple days say both companies are still doing business in Russia. :-/

Protests in occupied cities. This is the best clip.

Correct: both Coke and Pepsi are still doing business in Russia. The difference (according to Internet chatter anyway) is that Coke put out a press release confirming it (though I can’t find direct confirmation of that), whereas Pepsi hadn’t made an official declaration. Hence the bit in the tweet about Pepsi having a choice.

We’re up to 9 visually confirmed air asset loses over 26 hours. Ukraine is setting up their own no-fly zone.

I presume deleted because of the conflict in sharing as opposed to it being not accurate? (and I’m quite conflicted, too)

Are they actually doing business? Because soda companies are a weird beast. They basically set up bottling companies around the world after WW2, which are technically not owned by them anymore, and then they sell the syrup/powder to them and it’s all done under license and all.

Saw video showing the Russians are now tasking Havocs to escort convoys, a tactic they used in Syria due to insurgent attacks on said convoys.

Hope the Ukrainian Special Forces have lots of Stingers.

This is great if true.

It was pretty inevitable. Either they got grounded in Russia, or the planes got repossessed as soon as they landed overseas. Either way, no flights unless they use domestic leased or owned outright planes, which isn’t many of them.

Deleted until there’s more context.