Nearly everyone commenting on the RPS review said it mattered to them. OTOH, they already knew, but still, it’s as valid a datapoint as any other.
Further than that, for some of them, it’s not just about whatever merits the case has, it’s also about they way Brad decided to fight it in the court of public opinion. It seems to me a casual mention is worthy, just like it is in the other SC. Rest assured, it had no influence on their score.
For many on this thread, he also personally lied to us or omitted just enough to give the wrong impression about the matter or their intentions. Of course we care.