Ah ha. So if I’m not mistaken, P&F’s original claim partially argued this point and asserted that basically all rights reverted to them once payment wasn’t made and/or the publisher went bankrupt. You’re saying that’s not how the termination of the contract would be handled. Did I misunderstand P&F’s claim, or are they just overreaching with this assertion? (Also, I didn’t get a chance to read through the whole amended claim… is this still in there?)