See, here’s the problem with this though…
Other than one throwaway section saying , “also Schwarzenegger”, the whole article is about Cortez.
Soo… If all that stuff about Cortez is just satire, then what’s the actual argument in favor of changing the Constitution?
The entire argument being made by Yglesias, is that Cortez is awesome. Like, that’s really the entire article. If you remove it or dismiss it as satire meant to lighten the mood… Then there’s nothing left in the article.
I don’t think you can just handwave away the stuff about Cortez when it’s the vast majority of the article.