ShivaX
3116
It’s weird to think of a dude so paranoid that he killed many of his best people and countless innocents as being the more rational actor, but at the same time I can’t really fault the idea.
At least until the end, when arguably Stalin was totally loopy, he was paranoid and ruthless, and often ignored his most intelligent advisors, but he by and large held tight to the overriding goal of preserving the Soviet Union. Even his otherwise almost inexplicable refusal to recognize that the Germans were invading in 1941 seems to have stemmed more from his wishful thinking driven by the realization that the USSR wasn’t ready for war than from any stupidity. And the purges, which in addition to being brutal were in the long run terribly harmful to Soviet military capability, were driven not by insanity or ego as much as by a case of paranoia like that of most dictators, only turned up to 11.
ShivaX
3118
Well, I consider paranoia (especially Stalin’s) a form of insanity and definitely a lack of being a rational actor, as a rule.
Purging your best and brightest because you think they’re out to get you, is a non-rational action in my book. Even if a few of them probably were out to get you, he went the “kill em all and let God sort them out” route while the world was at war.
Well, yes, but we’re looking at this from the standpoint of dictatorial, tyrannical despots, where the bar is a bit lower! Paranoia comes in varying degrees, and Stalin definitely had it in spades. Still more rational than Putin I think in the end, at least, in the ways that international relations can work with.
Timex
3121
I’m gonna go on the side of “don’t let the Chinese operate next to our bases”.
Y’know, I too think this is good advice. Given the relationship between so-called private businesses and the PRC in general, letting them set up shop next to potentially sensitive areas seems like an unnecessary if perhaps relatively moderate risk.
The news about the Philippines is not surprising, though it is sort of ironic given the effort we put in to leaving bases in the PI not all that long ago. When I lived there it was certainly a hotbed of US military activity, but then, that was, um, really long time ago! I think one of the places I lived is under volcanic ash now as well.
Honestly to me it just seems weirdly shortsighted, or possibly xenophobic. If the Chinese can get useful intel by buying a plot of land near a military base, then… that plot of land shouldn’t be for sale to anyone. If the Chinese were doing this for the intel, then it wouldn’t be a Chinese agribusiness buying the land, it would be some Panamanian shell company or something. Or it would be Monsanto and they’d just get a spy in as an employee there. I mean, they’re not stupid.
Regardless as to how much sense this makes, this tactic is becoming a popular Republican strategy. There was a recent story about how Gov Youngkin (R-VA) withdrew from consideration for a Ford battery plant (potentially located near Richmond) because Ford was in some sort of partnership with a Chinese company. Didn’t matter that Ford was going to run the plant and that it was going to bring a number of good jobs to a pretty poor area, he was all about the anti-Chinese strutting.
Menzo
3127
Except it’s pretty clear China is actively stealing our country’s business secrets and trying to influence our politics. There is good reason to not want more Chinese investment in America and in American companies.
I would be surprised to learn that the US government wasn’t trying to steal Chinese secrets, or trying to influence their politics. So it isn’t just that. It’s the idea that China is a future adversary in a shooting war that seems to be the guiding premise.
I guess if we don’t want Chinese investment in American businesses or property, we ought to pass some laws to restrict it, so that it isn’t being managed on an ad hoc, case by case basis.
Menzo
3129
I’m sure they are. Let China deal with that if they want to.
I think there are reasons to be cautious about certain Chinese products / companies (e.g. fundamental telecoms infrastructure). But a corn mill? That kind of investment is a hostage, not a threat.
Menzo
3132
Not becoming more economically reliant on China is another reason to be wary. How reliant is China on American businesses? Not very. In fact, they have very strict laws about foreign investment that make it very, very difficult for this reason.
That’s a mutual dependence, isn’t it. A Chinese business that could lose its income and assets any time Sino - US relations broke down.
Menzo
3134
Very different economies. If China wasn’t acting like an antagonist and competitor, I would feel differently.
That must be a contender for one of the least interesting or sensitive US Air Force bases on the continent. Let’s spend $millions on a mill so we can spy on the the 348th Reconnaissance Squadron (some guys in a hut flying Global Hawks located elsewhere), or the 319th Civil Engineer Squadron, or the 319th Healthcare Operations Squadron. Wouldn’t a spy with a plane ticket be a bit cheaper?
What does that mean? Money is money. China can’t print dollars.