It is vastly more powerful than the DS, and the DS was very impressive for a handheld at the time of its release. Not sure where the DS hate is coming from, but it’s pretty silly.
That’s what I was replying to. But the 3DS isn’t exactly set for a great sales success either, the way it looks now.
So you’re wrong either way you want to slice it, then.
This is nonsense. Suddenly handhelds should offer more than consoles a few years later? I guess that’s why the PSP failed. I was trying to illustrate that $250 is not particularly expensive for a videogame system.
I’m sorry? I mean this is just wrong, the PS2 still holds that title.
It lost the title for some time, but a nebulous “no, wait, the PS2 has sold 150 million units” press release from Sony put the PS2 back on top in February, it seems. The DS remains the fastest selling system of all time, though, and will be the top selling system of all time permanently by the end of 2011.
On a side note, who the hell is still buying PS2s? Are people putting one in every room of their homes now? Wallpapering guest rooms with them? Then again, I have the same questions about the DS.
And you can’t use the words “launch lineup” and “overall sales to date” in the same sentence for a system that is almost 7 years old.
According to you, “Because the price point and launch lineup is mainly what determines how well a console is going to do.” So yeah, apparently the launch lineup has far-reaching consequences according to you. Except now it doesn’t.
People, the 3DS is going to do very well. You don’t have to buy it immediately. I would argue there’s no reason to buy it immediately or even until Christmas 2011, if then. But if you don’t believe it isn’t going to be a system worth owning in the future, you’re nuts.