Dear sir, it is my sad obligation at this point to respectfully reprimand you for your deplorable neglect of System Shock as an innovation that, despite being highly overlooked due to circumstances beyond its control, was of many leagues above the standard of its days long years before Half-Life was heard.

I don’t agree with you or Gus, I love Doom 2 style shooters, but i found Painkiller boring. It’s a very mediocre game.

Wow if you folks find Painkiller boring I’m definitely playing the wrong shooters.

Naw, you just have bad taste in shooters. The support group is at Tom’s house.

I enjoyed Painkiller as a run-n-gun. For what it was it kept me entertained for a while. I will admit the weapons were extremely fun to use. Even the titular painkiller was a fun weapon to use.

In the end though it lacked a lot of things to keep it engaging, and so it was resigned to “If I’m bored and want a quick game” section of games I have.

I haven’t played Serious Sam. I don’t think I will play it either. I’m just more of an rpg/adventure gamer.

It’s time for Yahtzee’s Top/Bottom 5 of 2011.

The lists, for reference. Watch the video first, you git.

Top 5:

[ul]
[li]5. Skyrim[/li][li]4. Infamous 2[/li][li]3. Bastion[/li][li]2. Driver: San Francisco[/li][li]1. Portal 2[/li][/ul]
Bottom 5:

[ul]
[li]5. Mindjack[/li][li]4. Red Faction Armageddon[/li][li]3. Dead Island[/li][li]2. Duke Nukem Forever[/li][li]1. MW3/Battlefield 3[/li][/ul]

I like it!

According to noscript The Escapist now references 15 different domains on that page. Christ almighty.

Sheesus, no wonder it’s so dang slow.

God I love Battlefield 3, but that’s probably because I’ve barely touched multiplayer in a decade (to save time) and it all feels so exciting again.

I’m the same Tim. Haven’t really played multilayer since the original Day of Defeat, started playing Modern Warfare 3 and loving it. One of the great strengths of first person shooters is that so many of the techniques I picked up play Day of Defeat transfer over.

Come on Qt3! Don’t start slacking on me. There was a new Zero Punctuation yesterday, and I just had to google around to find it.

Super Mario 3D Land & Rayman Origins.

It’s interesting that he finds it encouraging that a large publisher like Ubisoft can put out a well-polished 2D platform on the modern gaming consoles. Meanwhile, here was Gamasutra’s take on it in their end of the year awards:

So basically, we’ll likely never see a game like Rayman Origins again.

Well, IDK if Yahtzee has a schedule or not…but I’m not subscribed to any RSS or email notifications or whatever and between RL and VL I oft forget there might be a new video up. So I usually only check ZP bi-monthly or something.

Unless someone bumps a thread here, of course.

As for the Gamasutra article…it’s all worth nothing when Ubisoft is a dumbfucked company that pees on PC and has so many people waiting in the woodworks to come and dance on their graves when the castle does eventually burns down.

In a sense, it could be argued that Portal is a platformer and the only one at that to make the transition to 3D successfully…at least financially (it may be critically acclaimed as portal, but I have not seen it beeing critically acclaimed as a platformer – in 3D – game).

Post Scriptum
I also agree that Rayman (rainman cough) was a rather forgetful character. Unlike Earthworm Jim, Dangerous Dave, Duke Nukem and the many others throughout the years.

New ZP comes out every Wednesday at noon ET, if memory serves.

While I appreciate Rayman Origins for what it is, a lot of the fawning over it and holding it up as an example of how the industry has realized the power of art and 2D and charm and blahblahblah seems to be entirely wrongheaded considering they barely broke the 50,000 mark across all platforms. It’s a beautiful game, but nobody wanted it, at least not for $60, and frankly it’s hard to blame them. It gets repetitive very, very quickly and it’s really the non-frustrating co-op that carries it for the most part. I’ve also always found Rayman and his world to be oddly sinister in some intangible way, but I figure that’s part of the appeal.

On the flip side, I don’t get at all why he’s so down on Mario 3D Land, because that’s pretty much the best 3D platformer I’ve played since…well, since Mario Galaxy. I disagree with every single thing he says about the game, I think. In fact, I’d say much of his commentary on it indicates he didn’t grasp much of the nuance of the game’s design at all, possibly from a burning desire to slam Nintendo at all costs. I’m all in favor of kicking Nintendo in the balls whenever appropriate, but this is a pretty damn good game.

Also the jab about how you paid $80 per 3D level is pretty silly. At least part of the cost of the system in my opinion goes toward buying a more powerful handheld, because the regular DS could never have done Mario 3D Land.

Except that the PC audience who actually feels that way is so small that Ubi has publicly contemplated dropping PC support completely, so you may have to wait quite some time for your bonfire party. Or, better yet, don’t buy Ubisoft games and just get over it already. Jesus.

In a sense, it could be argued that Portal is a platformer and the only one at that to make the transition to 3D successfully…at least financially (it may be critically acclaimed as portal, but I have not seen it beeing critically acclaimed as a platformer – in 3D – game).

That would be because it’s not a platformer at all, it’s a puzzle game. I can’t even think of a point in Portal 2 that required me to carefully time or gauge a jump. It’s all about placing the portals properly and then being carried to your goal by the game’s physics.

Post Scriptum
I also agree that Rayman (rainman cough) was a rather forgetful character. Unlike Earthworm Jim, Dangerous Dave, Duke Nukem and the many others throughout the years.

Forgettable. Forgetful means he doesn’t remember stuff well. Although to be fair Rayman seems to be stoned out of his mind most of the time so he may well be forgetful, as well.

I wonder what the development costs were.

That stinks! Granted, I didn’t buy it either, but this is the first I’ve heard of it… and I’m damn close to going out to the store to pick it up right now!

Is Little Big Planet considered a platformer? If so it probably makes for a far better example at this than Rayman ever does.

Well, isn’t it arguably small since in the first place they’ve been pissing on PC + the crap DRM making almost no one on PC want to buy their games?
Quid Pro Quo.

Ha Ha Ha. Noted. Thanks.

Yeah, but not generally considered a very good one. LBP is an excellent creativity tool, but most people agree the actual platforming is somewhat torpedoed by the incredibly floaty jump mechanics.

Well, isn’t it arguably small since in the first place they’ve been pissing on PC + the crap DRM making almost no one on PC want to buy their games?
Quid Pro Quo.

Maybe, maybe not. The console audience is much, much larger than the PC audience for Ubi’s games, even without draconian DRM, which is probably why they’re not all that afraid to piss the PC audience off with said draconian DRM. I’m just saying that it might be time to stop being surprised by it.

I made good on this post and bought it. Good deal going on at Toys R Us right now - $20 for this game. It is marked $30 on the shelf, but it will ring up at $20.