Yeah, it can be contingent on the device you’re viewing it on. If you’re watching from a source or on a screen that can’t do the higher refresh, you won’t see the difference (but then you also don’t need to worry about the soap opera effect—you won’t get that either).
Yeah, I’ve had some coworkers tell me the only reason I like shitty 24 frames per second is that my brain is used to it, and if I watched 60 Hz in the theater for a few years, I’d get used to it.
I admit, that could be true. But it doesn’t feel true.
If you ate nothing but over-cooked steak for a couple years you might develop a taste for it as well, but that doesn’t mean it’s good. Tell your coworkers they are just wrong.
The part that bothers me the most is when people move, or when the camera seems to pan. It’s as if different parts of the screen are moving at different speeds.
Some CRT’s had low refresh rate settings, and it made the screen blinky. It was most noticeable if you were seeing the screen in your peripheral vision. There was a girl in college who was doing 12 hour animation days in front of her screen and would always be complaining of migraines. I suggestedshe try setting the refresh rate higher… like everyone else had done… but she gave me one those curt "no"s that make you happy to turn away and let suffer.
I believe motion interpolation is on by default in most TVs. Or 3:2 pulldown or whatever it’s called.
edit: okay I just spent the last 2 hours arguing with some buddies with how they are wrong about motion interpolation. I have decided it is an impossible mission.
Was visiting the in-laws this summer and we decided to watch a DVD. I corrected the settings on the TV to anamorphic and everyone (wife, father-in-law, and my daughter) was flipping out because it looked better before I fiddled with it - you know, when it “took up the whole screen” and they couldn’t watch it because of the bars on the sides (it was an old black and white film, White Heat) were distracting. I tried to show them the difference, how stretched out the actors and scenery looked, how with the correct setting the image was crisper.
I won, but was annoyed. Then I realized they have never complained at home and that’s when I noticed the bars on this particular TV were not black but white. I hadn’t even noticed until halfway through - I guess because I was focusing on the damn film like they should have been, but once I did it became slightly distracting. Still not as distracting as watching a film in the incorrect aspect ratio!
That’s because the streamers are filming themselves in 60fps, so you don’t have algorithms trying to fill in any in-between frames. The Matrix looks weird at 60fps because it was filmed at 24fps, and algorithms are trying to fill in the middle.
It might help to give them specific examples where it sucks the most. Like 0:17-0:20 when Hugo Weaving moves his head back and forth slightly. Looks awful.