Not admitting his huge part in destroying democracy’s underpinnings. Probably even to himself, at least to it’s full extent.

Probably money. He also gets to wield enormous power with no restraints for years, apparently.

He’ll be a hero of the far-right for the rest of his life.

I’m sure a big part of it is the power trip. Ego. The money is also a big deal. I just don’t get his headspace. I’m sure that there are many people like him. Just can’t understand the motivation.

Could he be genuinely a true believe in the natural law stuff? Like this speech:

The Founding generation were Christians. They believed that the Judeo-Christian moral system corresponds to the true nature of man. Those moral precepts start with the two great commandments – to Love God with your whole heart, soul, and mind; and to Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself.

But they also include the guidance of natural law – a real, transcendent moral order which flows from God’s eternal law – the divine wisdom by which the whole of creation is ordered. The eternal law is impressed upon, and reflected in, all created things.

From the nature of things we can, through reason, experience, discern standards of right and wrong that exist independent of human will.

Modern secularists dismiss this idea of morality as other-worldly superstition imposed by a kill-joy clergy. In fact, Judeo-Christian moral standards are the ultimate utilitarian rules for human conduct.

They reflect the rules that are best for man, not in the by and by, but in the here and now. They are like God’s instruction manual for the best running of man and human society.

I think we all recognize that over the past 50 years religion has been under increasing attack.

On the one hand, we have seen the steady erosion of our traditional Judeo-Christian moral system and a comprehensive effort to drive it from the public square.

On the other hand, we see the growing ascendancy of secularism and the doctrine of moral relativism.

By any honest assessment, the consequences of this moral upheaval have been grim.

Virtually every measure of social pathology continues to gain ground.

will not dwell on all the bitter results of the new secular age. Suffice it to say that the campaign to destroy the traditional moral order has brought with it immense suffering, wreckage, and misery. And yet, the forces of secularism, ignoring these tragic results, press on with even greater militancy.

Among these militant secularists are many so-called “progressives.” But where is the progress?

We are told we are living in a post-Christian era. But what has replaced the Judeo-Christian moral system? What is it that can fill the spiritual void in the hearts of the individual person? And what is a system of values that can sustain human social life?

The fact is that no secular creed has emerged capable of performing the role of religion.

This is not decay; it is organized destruction. Secularists, and their allies among the “progressives,” have marshaled all the force of mass communications, popular culture, the entertainment industry, and academia in an unremitting assault on religion and traditional values.

These instruments are used not only to affirmatively promote secular orthodoxy, but also drown out and silence opposing voices, and to attack viciously and hold up to ridicule any dissenters. …

Law is being used as weapon in a couple of ways.

First, either through legislation but more frequently through judicial interpretation, secularists have been continually seeking to eliminate laws that reflect traditional moral norms.

At first, this involved rolling back laws that prohibited certain kinds of conduct. Thus, the watershed decision legalizing abortion. And since then, the legalization of euthanasia. The list goes on. …

The times are hostile to this. Public agencies, including public schools, are becoming secularized and increasingly are actively promoting moral relativism.

If ever there was a need for a resurgence of Catholic education – and more generally religiously-affiliated schools – it is today.

I guess that whole argument is undercut by how blatantly immoral Trump and the entire administration is, even in purely Christian standard…

That about covers it. And your point is?

So that whole piece explains a lot to me. Delusion.

That’s why I’m a Costanzist (a form of post-modern secularism). Morals are derived from the fact that we are living in a society, and that we are supposed to act in a civilized way.

Trump is an incompetent buffoon. Imagine Barr as President, because something like that is probably what we get next time they get someone in office.

I find it hard to believe that anyone who believes in natural law would then follow someone like Trump who do clearly breaks it at every opportunity.

This.

Because he thinks they’re going to win with his help. He thinks they have to win, because if they lose then that’s the end of the world. The mongrelized multicultural feminist socialists take over and destroy America. So he has to stay on board, he has to fight to win with every bit of corrupt power he can muster. That’s the game.

Oh hey look, traitors!

What a surprise.

At least our enemies will be able to safely continue compiling kompromat without the hassle of pesky American oversight!

But of course.

Well, sure, it’s ok if you’re a Republican. That’s his answer to every question. Also, every Republican’s answer to every question.

Pretty hard to believe that Flynn isn’t going to get some jail time, given how many times he’s gone back to the well of pissing Judge Sullivan off.

I think its probably too early to assume that; he’s been trying mightily to blow up his plea deal and piss of the judge. Today was not good, for Flynn OR his lawyer (who called out directly in the opinion).

If you like the twitters, this is a good overview:

Yes, I wasn’t clear. I was saying I think he is going to jail.