And let’s not forget that Shitgibbon wrote out his responses to Mueller. That’ll be fun compare and contrast.
This news coming out makes Rudy’s deranged interview the other night more explainable.
Reference to (late 70s?) gang move “Warriors”. He is taunting them, repeatedly saying “warriors … come out to plaaaay”.
From what I understand that bit was ad-libbed, and it is perfect.
But that baby had it coming!
Little known early 1980s Hollywood rule: David Patrick Kelly always had to play a character named Luther.
How legit is Buzzfeed as a news source? Lots of journos seem to be taking it fairly serious, so I’m guessing they have a good rep?
They have been absolute money on stories like this.
Their reporters on the DC beat covering issues with Trump and the SCO are pretty top-notch.
Jason Leopold, the lead reporter on this particular story, was a Pulitzer finalist in 2018.
EDIT: …and second reporter, Anthony Cormier, DID with the Pulitzer in 2016 for investigative reporting with the Tampa Bay Times.
There’s a big difference between ‘Buzzfeed’ and ‘Buzzfeed News’. Confusing? Yep.
Also, Chuck Woolery is such a worthless tool.
Yep, definitely. A different sphere, but analogous to the difference between MTV and MTV news in the 1990s.
And there’s been evidence that the President may have suborned perjury.
But if these allegations are true, and if there’s a paper and electronic trail in emails and communications, it shows not only the encouragement of perjury, but as Marcy points out here, with the President a part of it.
How’s that working out for you, Jon, you republican propagandist?