UFOs are scouting our nuclear weapons stockpile

[John_Many_Jars]

I fucked a 40-foot tube one time. I made that thing come so hard …

Damn.

[newbrof]

you spoiled a perfecty fine endpoint by @John_Many_Jars It was a work of art in the UFO thread. Now it is ruined by some comic. Enjoy yourself!

[anonymgeist]

This just means that JMJ will need to keep coming and working harder to really finish off the thread with a bang to leave all involved satisfied.

[John_Many_Jars]

I finished off that 40-foot tube with a bang after HOURS of oral.

By the way, angel:alien::oral:anal

Think about it.

[Wallapuctus]

[Woolen_Horde]

The Washington Post

[John_Many_Jars]

http://moonlander.seb.ly/

[RichVR]

I was pretty good at that as a kid. Now I make craters.

[Menzo]

@Woolen_Horde

didn’t find evidence of extraterrestrials

Exactly what they would say!

Aliens confirmed.

[John_Many_Jars]

Just takes practice, dawg!

[Juan_Raigada]

Cool, so the report is out and it says little new. Shocking!

Interesting snippet:

In a limited number of incidents, UAP reportedly appeared to exhibit unusual flight characteristics. These observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or observer misperception and require additional rigorous analysis.

So the whole theory of having loads of high quality data that proves physics defying behavior is surprisingly bogus. It’s just the contemporary equivalent blurry photos and earsay.

Who could have guessed?

Another good one:

The UAPTF holds a small amount of data that appear to show UAP demonstrating acceleration or a degree of signature management

They can accelerate!!! We are doomed.

This was the report that was going to “change everything”…

[TheWombat]

“Acceleration,” and particularly “signature management,” are important if you are thinking of the UAPs as being controlled by something or being under their own intentional control I guess. I think the reason they called that out is to note that, yes, there is some small amount of data pointing to the possibility that a few of the UAPs observed may fall into the category of something that moves with intent. As you say, though, a whole lot of 'nuthin there.

[Juan_Raigada]

I mean, yes, there’s a possibility of drones or other devices used for information gathering from foreign powers. That’s very serious and seems a real possibility.

But there’s nothing really outlandish there.

[TheWombat]

@Juan_Raigada

But there’s nothing really outlandish there.

Yep. Probably because 99.99% of all of this is dreadfully mundane stuff when you get to the bottom of it.

[vinraith]

Full report is here: https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelimary-Assessment-UAP-20210625.pdf

The executive summary does a nice job of, well, summarizing:

[MikeJ]

I was kind of hoping they would do some ‘additional rigorous analysis’ for this report.

[Profanicus]

@MikeJ

I was kind of hoping they would do some ‘additional rigorous analysis’ for this report.

Yeah I thought that was the point of it. :P

[newbrof]

@MikeJ

rigorous analysis

I only know of one guy capable of rigorous analizing…

[Calelari]

Is that what the kids call it these days?

[MikeJ]

The part where they talk about using machine learning to cluster reports seems a bit ridiculous. How about first getting people who understand the sensors to look at incidents in more detail?

Classifying 1 out of 144 when you are using the cases with the best data seems like a pretty crappy record. On article says this was the result of two guys working for half a year. That would explain how vague it is.