The entire report basically boils down to “we didn’t know what these were before, and we don’t know what they are now.”
MikeJ
1893
Which would be interesting if we knew how much expertise and effort was expended trying to explain things. Are these things really hard to explain as boring explanations like sensor error or birds balloons etc? Or did they not really try? I mean, I feel like Mic West has put in more effort than the US Intel community at this point.
Yeah, pretty much. I think the last paragraph is particularly telling - in a lot of cases there’s just not enough data in what was recorded to really figure out what it was, and if we want to figure it out in future cases we’re actually going to have to coordinate data collection and analysis and put some effort and resources into it. Honestly, unless there’s a clear threat (i.e. one of these things turns out to actually, clearly be a foreign power) I’m not sure I see that happening.
Menzo
1895
Realistically, though, even if they knew what they were (not aliens), it’s possible they would not want to tip their hand to whatever nation state deployed them.
Oh sure, but I really do think it’s as simple as a lack of data in most cases.
UAP exhibited wobbly bowlegged movements compatible with having been freshly cornholed by JOHN MANY JARS, which proves UAP is female because JMJ’s not gay
Look John, these are aliens, so you would have no way of knowing what the hell you just cornholed. “Oh, she walked nice and had these huge amazing firm breasts.” A bowlegged alien camel maybe?
You’ve got to learn some discretion, son. God only knows what sorts of progeny you have running loose out there.
I approve of the new direciton this thread has taken
I’m starting to think that none of you people watched Star Trek for the ruminations on post-scarcity humanity.
Never used a condom, never will. I got kids all over the fuckin’ place, and they never cost me a dime. My priority is living with dignity.
I watched the expanse instead.
So say we all!
– Mal Reynolds, captain, Millenium Falcon
I love the talk about clappin alien cheeks, especially as I’m deep in my rekindled romance with Liara in Mass Effect 3. However, if I may stray back onto the topic for a moment…
TIL that GoFast and Gimbal are videos of the same object, taken about 10-20 minutes apart in the same mission. The debunker’s explanation is that GoFast was a bird and Gimbal was a flare of exhaust from another fighter. But, if they’re the same object and incident, they can’t be both a bird and another fighter jet (both of which the flight crews misidentified). Interesting.
In other news, Jeremy Corbell released a new UFO video that’s totally unremarkable and probably a helicopter and is doing nothing to help his cause. Guy is a clown and I wish he’d go away.
Source?
All the Navy said is that they were recorded the same month.
Same day:
The Navy did not offer the exact designation numbers for the videos, but did reveal the dates for all three incidents. “[The] dates are 14 November 2004 for ‘FLIR1’ and 21 January 2015 for both ‘Gimbal’ and ‘GoFast.’”
There’s a mission number and timestamp on the two videos that indicate they’re the same flight and about 15 minutes apart. Also one of the pilots chatting in the two videos sound like the same guy.
It’s kind of impossible they are the same object, since in the GIMBAL video the object is cold (which matches a stationary baloon) and in the GO Fast it’s hot (which matches a flare exhaust).
So even if it’s the same mission, I don’t buy it’s the same object, and you would have to find an explanation for the temperature change. The plane could have moved 200-300 km at that speed in that time.
The pilots being the same guys (confusing parallax with speed in both cases) does match to a T, though.
wasn’t it the other way around? GO Fast was something like a cold balloon, looking fast because of parallax effect and false estimation of height (it was not low flying). And Gimbal was that video of heat flare effect, with a camera losing focus and tracking, also rotating (due to gimbal).
Anyways, the last Corbell video was a joke. Lights that look like lights from any plane, drone or helicopter…
Ah yes, got them mixed up. The point is that one is cold and the other hot. Clearly not the same object.
But if the object is in fact a dick, it may have been tumescent at the hot sighting and detumescent at the cold sighting.
Of course, a UAP, or Unidentified Aerial Phallus. Suddenly it all makes sense.
