The fact that you’re thinking in the thousands of dollars already tells me that you’re well overestimating the level of quality I’m looking for. Admittedly, $100 may have been a lot lower than is practical, but bear in mind I’m not looking for something to knock my socks off.
It’s like … if someone came to me and said “So I wanna get a new camera, but I only have $100-$150 to spend.” I could say “Come on. If you want even a halfway decent camera, you’re gonna need to drop at least $300-$350. Hell, mine cost me about $2,600 and it’s not even the best there is. And that’s just for the body. Forget lenses. That’s another $1000 per, easy.”
Or, I could say “Well, you should know in advance that you’re not gonna get results anywhere near the level that you would if you spent $300-350, but if you’re fine with that then the [B]Canon Powershot A590[/B] should suit your basic needs. The zoom is mediocre and it’s only 8mp, but that’s more than you’ll need. And the image quality is pretty decent.”
I understand a $100-150 budget is probably a nigh-insulting figure to quote an audiophile, but the quality of my home theater isn’t so important to me that I can justify spending much more than that. All I want is a step up from the tv speakers and my old Logitechs. And if there’s nothing I can buy in a bare speaker and I’m better off just using that money to buy a new Logitech or Creative speaker kit, then so be it. If it can’t be done, it can’t be done. And I’m fine with that. I just (obviously) know dick about speaker tech, and wanted to ask for input before I foolishly went spending my money on things I can’t use.