I for one applaud what Nvidia is doing, and rebellious criminals like HardOCP should be punished. Glory to Nvidia!
Ah, $599 founders now, or $499 for the regular version, at some point in the near future. Expensive!
1070 Ti seems like the deal of 2018.
nVidia are pretty consistent bad actors. They make good hardware which should speak for itself, but they never seem able to resist their anti-consumer, anti-competitive, unethical impulses. Itâs the reason I refuse to buy their cards.
stusser
2929
HardOCP compared it to a factory overclocked 1080, so thatâs fair.
When HardOCP contacted Nvidia about getting RTX samples, they were told they would get them if they signed the NDA. They had a lawyer look at it, and it was pretty off the wall stuff in terms of media control, so they didnât sign it and instead sourced the card themselves.
Keep in mind that every other outlet reviewing RTX hardware did sign that NDA.
Nvidia is in a dominant position in the market, and theyâre flexing their muscles.
Nesrie
2930
I think someone in this topic asked about pre-builds and the new cards, so I am putting this here. This is from Slickdeals.
$1643
SPEC:
Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Thermaltek View 21 2x Side Tempered Glass Chassis
Core i7-8700K
Corsair Hydro H60 120mm Water Cooler
iBUYPOWER 1 RGB Lighting Strip
ASROCK Z390 PRO 4 / ASUS PRIME Z390-P / MSI Z390-A PRO
16GB DDR4L (2x 8GB) 3000 MHz Ram
480 GB ADATA SU650 SSD
Nvidia RTX 2080 8GB GDDR6 Graphics
iBUYPOWER Gaming Keyboard
iBuypower RGB 3200 DPI 6 Button Optical Mouse
iBuypower Gaming Mouse Pad
650W Thermaltake Toughpower Grand RGB 80+ Gold Modular PSU
FREE SOFTWARE
Intel Q3 Adobe Creative Bundle
Call Of Duty: Black Ops 4 full game
SUGGESTION: Pick up Octa Core i7-9700K by paying $24 extra
I have not used this company before, but they frequently come up on deal sites.
All the other reviews for the 2070 are out now. Looks to be around 10-15% slower than a 1080ti at stock and 5-10% slower when overclocked. Iâm leaning towards the 2080 if I do upgrade this round.
I donât go there often, but historically Iâve always thought they were one of the better, more through review sites and tend to rate their opinion relatively high.
stusser
2933
Iâve read HardOCP for over a decade, theyâre great. Popularity fading these days as more of it moves to YouTube and such, but still certainly legitimate.
As for the 2070, I basically think this generation is going to be seen as a failure. Nvidia would really bleed if AMD was capable of competition.
Yep the more performance numbers and prices I see for the RTX20xx cards the more bitter I become.
If the RTX2080ti was released as a RTX2080 @ $900 and the other cards then fall in line, I think the consensus would have been it is a great generation.
AMD get off your ass and do something. :|
October is over in 2 weeks and still no DLSS or RTX capable games available.
stusser
2935
Yes, that would have been appropriate. The 2070 should be as fast as a 1080ti and cost about $400. Thatâs what everybody expected based on pricing and performance in previous generations. Instead, they have their VALUE card priced at $600.
At this point I expect the 2060 to launch at $400.
Yep, and I am betting with no RTX or DLSS, I wonder if they are doing a dedicated chip for it.
Like Mr. Bauman would say when arms were getting strong⌠âCan I quote you on that?â
KevinC
2939
Iâm sitting tight until AMD brings the fight. The price/performance of this generation is abysmal and there wonât be enough games to take advantage of ray tracing for me to give a shit before the 3000-series is out.
Theyâre likely to be binned versions of the 2070 chips.
Nvidia really needs to have the RTX features in a sub-$500 card in order to gain anything resembling widespread adoption.
stusser
2941
Even the 2080 or the 2080ti (they didnât specify which it was) can barely handle 1080p gaming at 60fps with ray-tracing on. The odds of the 2070 and below doing it seem slim. DLSS sure, raytracing no.
Thatâs based on early demos though. Iâm not saying youâre wrong, just that we wonât know for a while yet if those demos were indicative of what to expect performance-wise.
stusser
2943
I guess thereâs a bunch of stuff you could do to limit the number of rays you need to calculate. Decrease the raytracing resolution, to use whatâs probably the wrong terminology. Like you said, we just donât know yet. That encapsulates a lot of why the 20 series is problematic.
Probably will see very limited use in most frames this generation due to performance issues, but itâll evangelize it to devs and each subsequent future gen will allow for greater use and better effects. Reminds me of the original GeForce and its T&L support.