deanco
1641
(ahem) 13 days, you assholes!
Wolff
1642
True we will have to see what the geoscape is like in the final product. If it is only as deep as the demo that will be a little disappointing.
Papageno
1643
Will we be shooting UFOs out of the sky as before? Please tell me yes.
Jajusha
1644
yes, and quite a few different type of ufos
Well, i have never seen anyone holding a rifle like that and unless he leans that hand on a solid, stable object, he should be far less balanced and accurate firing like that.
While being mobile it should be even worse.
Well, it does seem like you would know. It’s too bad they didn’t consult you first, now I’m cancelling my pre-order. Bastards. If there is one thing that I just can not abide, it’s the lack of realism in my alien invasion strategy video game.
Murbella
1647
And that female soldier in the video… A female lead does not have knees that sharp! I nearly canceled my cheap GMG preorder in disgust. Nearly.
Tony_M
1648
I was just curious. I’ve never seen a rifle held like that even in a Hollywood or Hong Kong film so I was just curious if it had some basis in reality or if it was just animators looking for something new.
Nesrie
1649
Yeah but I read in some preview that they never saw more than one UFO at a time, and there is never more than one ship at a time. I have no idea how accurate that is, but if it is one ufo, one ship sort of takes out the strategy part of the geo part.
wiglaf
1650
You will occasionally have to choose between multiple abduction sites, as in the demo, but even that’s not as well done in the original. I liked rushing to one abduction site, then taking off and seeing if I could get to the second in time before it disappeared.
Some of Firaxis’ changes are justifiable, but a lot of it is blatant Civ-Rev style dumbing down.
ShivaX
1651
I’m too lazy to look it up in a movie, but it reminded me of some strange variation on a stance used by target shooters. Definitely… odd. Since it tends to only be viable against static targets.
Gryff
1652
Not precisely the stance, but also the way have I have seen a rifle held in competition;


wiglaf
1653
Yeah, those stances balance the gun on the knees. In X-COM, they do it standing up.
Gryff
1654
Yeah, I would expect them to use the standard target free standing grip, which has the offhand elbow tight against your chest. Looks very odd though, and would generate similar comments.
Razgon
1655
The stance is fine, as I understand it, its because you are poised for a longer stay when you are sitting down like that - otherwise its for quick movement.
No need to be so bitterly cynical about a man on the internet participating in a discussion you started, lol.
deanco
1657
In 2025, scientists discover that the sniper stance in XCOM is actually more efficient than the stance you’re used to back in old 2012.
They also discover that cigarettes are actually good for you.
Savillo
1658
The Geoscape this time around seems to play second fiddle to base management. Your base screen is the default strategy layer, and the Geoscape is just a single room (Mission Control) within. The only thing you can do within the Geoscape is pass time via the “Scan for UFOs” button. Everything else is prompted, i.e., when a UFO is detected or alien abduction missions appear, you’re asked whether or not you want to send an interceptor or the Skyranger, respectively.
This is my experience as well. UFO detection was always a one-at-a-time thing. The only time you have to make a choice between competing missions is during the prompt for alien abductions (one of three options).
Tony_M
1659
The Geoscape was the weakest aspect of the original game. I’m glad they’ve changed it. They either had to simply it or flesh it out alot more.
I actually didn’t start the discussion. I was being cynical? Bitterly so, even?