50 Years Ago Today

Back to Hunt and Liddy, for just a moment.

So. It’s the end of November and early December of 1972. Liddy and Hunt – the two “masterminds” of the Watergate break-in, get together with their lawyers. They met over the course of a week or so to discuss a major concern for all involved: money.

Both Hunt and Liddy had been promised that the legal fees for their defense, as well as those of the 5 actual burglars, would be paid for. Delays in receiving money had been explained away as the difficulty of arranging these payments in a way that didn’t tie back to the White House or the Committee to Re-elect.

Hunt was especially incensed. While the White House had been slow to get funds to him and Liddy, they’d essentially hung the burglars themselves out to dry. Much of the time in these meetings was spent trying to mollify Hunt. For his part, Liddy remained the macho-man rock of the enterprise. Money for his legal defense would be great, but he didn’t care if he went to jail or not.

If you were going to analyze the situation, you’d conclude that if one of these two guys was going to break and start talking…well, that guy was going to be Hunt.

Anyway, 50 years ago today, United Airlines Flight 553 needed to abort a landing at Chicago’s Midway Airport. It circled around to make a second approach, when the pilot made a fatal error and stalled out the 737, sending it crashing into the West Lawn neighborhood that surrounds Midway. 40 of the 55 people on board the flight were killed, along with two people on the ground.

Among the dead were US Congressman George Collins, CBS News reporter Michele Clark…and Dorothy Hunt, the wife of 25 years of E. Howard Hunt. Among Mrs. Hunt’s possessions was found $10,000 in $100 bills. No one’s ever fully explained that money, but we do know that Howard Hunt had been scraping up money and then having Mrs. Hunt deliver it to the wives of the Watergate burglars. It seems likely that she was either going to be met in Chicago (where she was from, and ostensibly visiting family on December 8, 1972), or planned to head to Miami for a brief stop on her way back to DC from Chicago later in the week.

The crash had two effects. The discovery of the $10,000 made Nixon livid. He at least was pretty sure this was payout money that someone who wasn’t Dorothy Hunt should’ve been distributing, and Nixon read the riot act to his subordinates that they needed to push John Mitchell into taking care of getting money out.

The other effect was on Howard Hunt himself. He loved his wife, and was crushed by her sudden, accidental death. By his own account he spiraled into a deep depressive state. He didn’t care so much what happened to his own self. But also: he was beginning to care less and less about protecting others, too.

The Second Nixon Term

One other thing from the White House, that was really noticed until 25 years after it was said in a review and transcription of the Nixon tapes.

In a meeting sometime after Thanksgiving but before Christmas of that year, Nixon and Haldeman are in a private meeting together with just the two of them in the Oval Office. And a casual conversation eventually turns to sketching out the second Nixon term in office.

And it’s a chilling conversation. Nixon opines that no one has seen the “real” Nixon yet. And what he means by that is that he fully expects to go hog wild on his enemies list over the next four years. Specifically, he wants investigations, indictments, and arrests and jail time for members of the media, for Democrats in congress, for anyone who Nixon has perceived to have done him wrong. After all, an act against Nixon is an act against the State, in his reasoning.

And if you’re suddenly in the mind of a certain more recent president…yeah. This conversation is Nixon at his most unhinged, and Haldeman listens and offers nothing but encouragement.

At some point, Nixon opines that his first term cabinet is largely useless. (He’s not wrong – the Nixon cabinet remains one of the most anonymous and completely powerless cabinets in US history; the only Nixon subordinates trusted with getting anything done were Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Kissinger, Mitchell, Chuck Colson and any subordinates to those men or in their immediate orbit. Note: none of those advisors required a senate confirmation to be appointed to their positions.)

And so Nixon’s first order of business for his ruthless second term: accept the resignations of (nearly) every member of his cabinet. When he had bothered to hear from them, it was to listen to them tell him why he couldn’t do the things he wanted to do. “That’s illegal, Mr. President,” they’d say. “You don’t have that authority, Mr. President” they’d whine. Well, he’d had enough. He accepted those first term cabinet appointees because they were foisted on him by his own party. But now he’d replace them, and replace them with loyal Nixonites who’d just do what the boss ordered and not harangue him about rules and laws and such.

And so by New Year’s Day, this part of the plan for Nixon’s second term was in place, as nearly his entire cabinet was forced to tender resignations that were accepted. Thankfully, events would intervene to prevent this dystopian second term from fully coming into formation.

So, Nixon as a bargain-basement Sulla. It rather works!

Seriously, though, thank you for these. I don’t know what your day job is, but you are extremely good at synthesizing complex materials in a readable, exciting, and concise format. I wish more of my colleagues had those skills…

The NY Times Fumbles Again

It’s December of 1972, and we’re in the months that DC kind of clears out. Incumbents won everything – the White House stays in Republican hands, both houses of congress remain controlled by Democrats. Which means that there’s very little reason for either side to spend the “lame duck” 8 weeks between the end of the current congress and the the start of the next one in January pushing much onto the table. Unless something urgent comes up, there’s no huge legislation they need to get to at this particular moment that can’t wait a month or so.

The Washington Post is spending this time laying low. Woodward and Bernstein are still talking to whatever sources will speak to them after the debacle of the October 25th article, but absent any huge new developments they’re laying low for now. Post Editor In Chief Ben Bradlee hasn’t given up on the story by any means, though. He senses that there’s absolutely something very untoward happening with the Watergate story. And he does believe that his two cub reporters essentially got the “Haldeman controls the money” story correct, even if they flubbed the grand jury testimony part of it.

What’s bothering Bradlee the most in this interregnum is that it feels to him and others in the Post braintrust that they’re flying alone. There’s too much smoke here for there not to be a fire, thinks Bradlee. Where are the other media outlets? Where’s that new CBS news show 60 Minutes? Where’s the LA Times? And most importantly, where’s the New York Times?

As mentioned up-thread a ways, when the NYT’s attempt to follow the money took them on a wild goose chase to Mexico, and they missed the big story of being able to tie the money found in possession of the burglars to the Committee to Re-elect. Since then, the Times had gone dark on Watergate, which kind of left the Post flapping in the breeze.

But the Times hadn’t given up on Watergate, either. In fact, the Times DC/White House bureau would get together at an office in the nation’s capital once or twice a week to plot strategy on getting a story that would hit hard and put them right back into the thick of the Watergate scandal reportage. And sure enough, in 1973 and 1974, the New York Times would break plenty of stories and sit in the vanguard of reporting on the scandal as it continued to snowball and destroy a presidency.

With that said, on this December day in 1972, the Times missed out on the biggest story of the entire affair.

The Times bureau was having one of their weekly “touch base” meetings to talk about Watergate back in December of 1972. They were kicking around story ideas, sources, who they could get on the record, and who would refuse and want to stay off the record.

An unfamiliar face showed up at the meeting about halfway through. It was Mike Lien, a photographer for the Times. Eventually in a lull in the conversation he spoke up. He had a tip for the group. The others listened.

Lien told the group that he’d been out having a beer the night before, and ran into a table of off-duty Secret Service agents who were there at the bar to blow off some steam. Lien knew the guys, and they were friendly with one another and so Lien was invited to join them.

And at some point during their conversation, one of the Secret Service guys let fly with a remarkable piece of information: all conversations in the Oval Office of the White House were taped.

Lien was stunned by this and called bullshit, but no, he was assured, it was true. In fact, he was told, the Secret Service were the ones who set up and maintained the taping system. Lien had so many questions about this but one stood out for him. Were the tapes then dutifully destroyed within a few hours, or a few days?

No no, he was assured. Absolutely not. The tapes were kept and filed and logged. They were held in a secure room in the White House basement.

Sitting in with the Times White House bureau that day, Lien connected the dots for them. “That means that anything they said about Watergate, and if they’re involved in it will be on those tapes you guys.”

It sounded far too good to be true. It frankly sounded ludicrous to the reporters sitting around the table. They asked some perfunctory questions of Lien, and then moved on.

The Times never followed upon this tip. In about 8 months, they’d wished they had.

They waited for Butterfield to mention it.

The Last men…

The North Korean dude will klep it.

I’m looking forward to this movie quite a lot more than I would otherwise have without this thread.

https://youtu.be/zXTmH6C4LHY

Yeah, that looks great! Love the casting, too.

Is that going to be a movie or a miniseries?

I believe it’s going to be a series.

I checked the IMDB, and it looks like a 5-part series. Excellent.

Can anyone tell who Toby Huss is playing? He’s in one of the mug shots in that trailer.

He’s playing James W. McCord who has a DOOZY of a momentous moment/day/week/month coming in the Watergate saga coming in March. McCord was one of the Watergate burglars, had direct ties to both the CIA and to John Mitchell and was kind of the outsider with this crew.

Cool. I’ve loved Huss since Halt and Catch Fire. (Didn’t know his roles in King of the Hill until later!)

Things are quiet in DC, 50 years ago today as the new year arrives. In a week or so, the new congress will be sworn in and seated. A few weeks after that, Judge Sirica will be holding guilty pleas for the five Watergate burglars, as well as E. Howard Hunt and G. Gordon Liddy. Things will really heat up then.

But for now, for the last day of the year, let’s turn attention elsewhere.

Cometh the Hour, Cometh the Man

If you were to go to central casting and ask them to send someone over who could play an irascible but lovable old Boston Irish politician – especially one who looked like he’d seen some thing and survived some political knife fights – and they sent over Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill, you’d laugh and send him back. Too obvious a typecast.

O’Neill won his House seat in 1952, after another Boston Irishman, John F. Kennedy, had vacated if for the Senate. And Tip – who was actually only “Tip O’Neill” to the DC press corps (hilariously, he was “Tom” to friends and colleagues) – knew he was no Jack Kennedy. He wasn’t super charismatic. He’d be the first to tell you he wasn’t the smartest guy in the House. Even in a clean, freshly-dry cleaned and pressed suit, he looked rumpled.

But Tip O’Neill had a superpower. He had an innate, unerring ability to sense what voters, in general, wanted. He could sense even the mildest changes in political winds long before anyone else could. His political instincts and something akin to political clairvoyance made him a valuable asset to the House Democrats, and so when a leadership position opened to be the Majority Whip (the number three man in the House party leadership, behind the Majority Leader and the number one man: Speaker of the House), O’Neill was put forward.

Just above O’Neill in the House leadership was wily Louisiana Democrat Hale Boggs. Boggs was a pretty fascinating guy. He was on the right side of history in Brown v. Board of Education, and drafted a huge memo for the Democratic party in the South in the late 1950s denouncing segregation. He’d served as the Majority Whip for 10 years before stepping up to House Majority Leader in 1971, opening the Whip position for O’Neill. It was Boggs who’d whipped the votes to pass LBJ’s Great Society legislation – Voting Rights Act, Civil Rights Act, etc. etc. (Boggs’ daughter, Cokie Roberts, would be a longtime fixture at ABC News from the 1980s through the 2000s.)

O’Neill figured that maybe House Majority Whip would be as high as he’d go – he was 60 when he assumed that role. But maybe…maybe he’d climb a little higher before he retired. He hoped to learn from the two congressmen above him, Boggs and House Speaker Carl Albert, about the intricacies of leadership positions within the party caucus. And then, maybe after a decade of apprenticeship on of those two would either retire or move up and he’d try leadership for a term or two.

But that sounds like a plan, and the political gods scorn such things. At a meeting in the summer of 1972, O’Neill let Albert and Boggs know that the Democrats could expect to lose between 10 and 20 seats in their House majority in the coming election. Not too much of an issue given the size of the Democratic majority, but both men were eager to try to prevent as many losses as possible.

One Democratic incumbent facing a close race was Alaska freshman congressman Nick Begich. Boggs decided to help Begich out with a fundraiser up in Alaska, a state Boggs was keen to see. On October 16th, Boggs and Begich took off in a small, twin-engine Cessna from Anchorage, bound for a fundraiser in Juneau. Their plane never landed. A 40-day search provided no clues whatsoever. (Ironically, a new federal aviation law had passed two weeks before the disappearance of this flight, one requiring all planes to carry an emergency locator beacon. Sadly, the deadline to install those beacons was December 31st. No wreckage of the plane – which likely crashed into the ocean off the coast in freezing rain that day – has ever been found.)

The two congressmen were legally declared dead at the end of December, 1972. Tip O’Neill suddenly found himself the House Majority Leader for the coming year. That might be an important thing.

And one thing that was definitely important was that Tip O’Neill’s finely tuned political antennae were perking away like crazy. Something about the 1972 election seemed…off. Not the result, really; he and most other Democrats expected a Nixon landslide win. But there were other things that felt very wrong.

For one thing, O’Neill knew the names and the amounts expected from the Democratic Party’s high profile, big-ticket donors. And he noticed early on that an expected donation from George Steinbrenner had never shown up. Steinbrenner had been a reliable contributor for over a decade. When Tip got him on the phone, Steinbrenner admitted that he’d been all but forced to kick in $100k to those anonymous Republican PACs mentioned in the link above. Tip gave the future Yankee owner some sage advice that he’d better watch his own ass, and hung up.

And as the summer of 1972 turned into Fall, O’Neill couldn’t help but notice a number of his party’s biggest donors – especially the ones he knew were vulnerable on various regulatory issues, or who needed some government help with a contract – had flipped to become “Democrats for Nixon.” Tom O’Neill was a veteran of Boston political ward fights; he knew strong-arm tactics when he saw them.

And so on January 3rd, 1973 just an hour after the 93rd Congress had been sworn in, O’Neill went to pay a visit to the office of House Speaker Carl Albert. He told Albert about his suspicions and about the way he sensed that something very bad had happened in 1972, and how it might involve all sorts of wrongdoing, somewhere. In fact, he told Albert, it wouldn’t surprise O’Neill at all if that Watergate thing was a piece of the puzzle.

In any event, he told Albert that it was possible, maybe even likely, that the unthinkable – impeachment – would be something the 93rd would at least be asked to fleetingly consider. Or maybe more than “fleetingly.” And Albert, even more of an institutionalist than the rookie, unlikely House Majority Leader told his colleague that if that indeed did come to happen, Tip O’Neill was going to be the one to take point on it, not him.

That was something that ran contrary to O’Neill’s own institutionalist mindset, but he also felt like he couldn’t ignore the warning sirens going off in his head, either. His political instincts hadn’t failed him yet, and this case they were telling him that the 93rd Congress was going be asked to consider some monumental choices regarding the White House. And O’Neill knew that if things really were to play out that way, he’d need to be ready.

Tip O’Neill! I used to get donuts at Verna’s in north Cambridge, supposedly his favorite donut place. The old ladies there would take pity on me when I showed up with an adorable six month old and an obvious lack of sleep and throw in some extra. Sadly, the place closed a few years back.

“All Politics is Local” is written on the side of the (Mildred A.) O’Neill library just down the street from there.

New Year, New You. Especially Your Cabinet.

January 7, 1973 and DC is blanketed with snow. It’s a Sunday morning, and the President has slept soundly after a productive first week of the year. Most of his new cabinet appointments have sailed through Senate confirmation, mostly because no one really knows who any of them are. There’s that scene in the movie “Major League” where a Cleveland fan looks at the current team and says “Who ARE these guys?” That’s the Nixon second term cabinet in a nutshell.

Nixon’s hand-picked all of them with one qualification in mind: they’re essentially clerks with rubber stamps. They are there to do the President’s bidding – not to advise. Not to raise concerns or present issues. Not to bring things to the President’s attention. They are to sit and wait until Nixon, or someone from his inner circle of Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Kissinger, or even Dean gives them something to do. Historian Arthur Schlesinger will call them the most anonymous cabinet in US history.

Nixon is also having fun with the newly elected congress by threatening impoundment of earmarked funds. Some of you folks may remember impoundment from 2017, when Trump threatened to do it to get money for his wall. It’s a term that refers to the president specifically NOT approving funds that congress has appropriated for certain tasks, or holding those funds in abeyance, or even using those funds for something else. It’s constitutionally…allowed, and in 1973 there’s no specific law to prevent it. (That’s coming with the 1974 Impoundment Control Act.)

Anyway, the Democratic majorities in the House and Senate are having kittens about Nixon impounding congressional appropriations, and Nixon is loving it. Soon he expects to unveil plans to put many members of congress under investigation with the DOJ. To sic the IRS on them. To bring the New York Times and the Washington Post to heel. It’s a new year, it’s a new Dick Nixon, and by the time the Bicentennial rolls around (Nixon has absolutely relished the idea that he’ll be the sitting president for the 200th celebration), he will make America more unified than ever, even if to do that he has to run the country as if he were king, and by edict. Either the opposition to him will come around to support him, or he’ll destroy them.

And after a few weeks of talking with Haldeman and Ehrlichman and John Dean, he feels like they have a plan – a good plan, he thinks, to get all this stupid Watergate nonsense out of the papers and wrapped up.

Want to Make God Laugh? Make a Plan.

Sometime after the election, the final plan for dealing with Watergate crystallizes in various Oval Office meetings with various trusted inner-circle advisors: Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Dean, Kissinger, and even a few phone calls to former AG and campaign chief John Mitchell.

The plan is this: the Watergate investigation stops – stops cold – with the 7 men under indictment. Those are the 5 burglars (Virgilio Gonzalez, Bernard Barker, James McCord, Eugenio Martinez, and Frank Sturgis) and the two “planners” (E. Howard Hunt and G. Gordon Liddy). Those men will likely need to do some jail time, but the plan involves somehow getting them some secret financial pay-offs to keep them silence, along with vague promises of some presidential action – a pardon, or clemency – in a year or two. Or something.

And then? Stonewall. Whitewash. Ignore subpoenas. Claim Executive Privilege. Nixon and his team are confident they can string out any further inquiries over the next few months until the public is sick of anything Watergate.

It’s a plan that is very long on concept, but the details and execution are vague at best. And the devil is in the details.

The Devil in the Details is Money. It’s Always Money.

For this segment, it’s probably useful to give this post from back in July a re-read, though I’ll try to sum it up. The crux of it is, from the moment the burglars were arrested and on through the ensuing months, one strategy in play for the Nixon administration has been paying them off. Buying silence.

And the problem with that as the central point in strategy is that they’ve been really, really bad at the actual process of buying everyone off. From the chilling realization by the McCords that the “5 months” of living expenses they’d been asked to calculate would only take them through the November election, to Dorothy Hunt dying in a plane crash with $10,000 in what was probably some extra pay-off funds to be distributed, Team Nixon has been spectacularly bad at getting money out to the accused.

And now the central tentpole of their 1973 strategy to contain the Watergate scandal to just the 7 men indicted, and to have that scandal fade into memory, is money and payouts. The big problem that Nixonites are having is that with the discovery of the slush fund to pay out on stuff like the break-in, that money has gone on lockdown. Everyone around Nixon knows that this money is now going to be heavily scrutinized, and using it for anything even remotely nefarious is guaranteed to result in disaster.

The Nixon team had left the finding of the needed money to John Mitchell. However, even a casual re-read of history will show that, in a group of massive idiots, John Mitchell is the idiot-est. Mitchell does less than nothing on this front, even though he’s been asked about it repeatedly. Eventually Haldeman and Nixon will find a source.

For the Watergate 7, it’s been no picnic, especially since November. The money they’d been able to get is used up or nearly so. The “Cubans” (as Barker, Gonzalez, and Martinez are collectively, and reductively, referred to) are hanging in there. Sturgis seems OK too. Liddy is Liddy. Hunt and McCord, however, aren’t taking this too much in stride. Hunt needs money. Dorothy’s death has sent him into a spiral, and he’s now facing jail time…and he’s got a special-needs child at home to care for. McCord never had the deep savings of Hunt to draw on in emergencies, and he’s been having to shine on his own lawyer with promises and shrugs. But he needs money. And he needs something concrete about a pardon. He’s not going to willingly take the fall for Watergate. He was CIA himself, and knows this operation wasn’t planned well enough to have come from any official intel operation. If they want a fall guy, McCord thinks, it’s not going to be him.

I had an opportunity to watch gaslit this past week - and while it has some value (particularly in the characterizations and depiction of the times), i vastly prefer your telling of it. I also dont think i would have made it through it without drawing upon a lot of what you’ve written, so thanks again :)