If you compared Civilization with Civilization 4, which game would you say was the best?
In terms of features Civilization 4 wins hands on, but I still think of Civilization 1 as the better game.
Half Life was a very good game, so were Doom, Quake and many others, but I still think of Duke3D as the best in the fps genre…
Of course it goes with Personal Taste, but should I not like a game that built on a predecessor and improved in almost every area MORE than I liked the ‘original’?
I’m trying to find out why I get less “enjoyment” out of most recent games than I did from the older versions / types.
Is it because you now have so much more choice as well as more attractions all fighting for your attention, combined with you working so you have less time to enjoy games than you did in the past… or are the games now just … not that good as the earlier ones?
Perhaps it is because the old games introduced something new, and were the ‘first’ experience of that “new-ness” so you remember them more fondly than the later versions of the game/type?
But why then do I like a game such as Galactic Civilizations 2 more than Galactic Civilizations 1… ? Star Control 2 before Star Control / SC3. Dune 2 Before Dune:Emperor and Dune 2000… C&C > all the later ones.
Morrowind more than Oblivion…Ultima Online more than any other MMORPG released since, except for WISH (which they cancelled, those bastards!)…
I want to like those ‘new’ games, but it seems like they always fall up short to my expectations - “It should be as fun, or more, than the “older” game. And prettier and more feature packed”…
Railroad Tyccoon 1 > Tyccoon 2 and 3…
I want to like the new games more, damn it! :-]
Or perhaps it is that you played a game in the past, but these days you just “consume” most of them…
Some games I do not even know why I play, I just want to complete them to ‘win’…