Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan - Reconsidered

My wife and I watched this movie in a few sittings over the weekend. I think it must have been the first time I’d seen it in probably a decade.

My first thought is that this movie holds up amazingly well. There are a couple special-effects shots that are pretty obviously green (or blue) screened with annoying white borders around the pieces-parts, but that’s about it. Even the CGI Genesis briefing holds up well because it was SUPPOSED to be a computer-generated simulation. Lots of the other stuff like the communicators and computer interfaces seemed generally fine and not out-of-place even in a nearly 40-year-old movie set in the future.

I guess if I were to nit-pick, the retinal scan of Kirk seems a bit quaint now that we have such stuff, and it seems a little ridiculous that a six-digit numeric password for all of a ship’s control systems could possibly be considered good security practice.

The Romulan Ale thing in the first act struck me as funny. McCoy gives some to Kirk even though it is technically illegal, and I’m sure that in 1982 it was an analogy to Cuban cigars. But McCoy’s reference to “medicinal purposes” made me think of the medical exemptions for marijuana, which I assume came long after this was filmed.

One new thing I got out of the re-watch was how the trainee crew was a character in itself. When the Reliant attacks the first time, there is a scene in the engineering bay where everyone is running around in a panic. Somehow, in the dozens of times I’ve watched the movie, I’d never heard Scotty yelling “Get back to your posts!” in the background. So I’ve always associated that scene with chaos and being unprepared, but never with inexperience or cowardice.

This time, I did see that the crew was supposed to be rising to the occasion, “Growing up faster than planned” in Kirk’s words. The later scene where the crew is marching with purpose through the halls holding tools or working with great coordination and efficiency to get everything in order before engaging the enemy did a good job or portraying their resolve and growth… even if it was all background stuff.

Another thing that stuck out for me was the poses of the opposing bridge crews. There are several scenes where people are standing around the Enterprise bridge in kind of silly spots simply so that they would be well-situated for the camera, but they always sort-of looked like there were there for a military reason. But on Reliant, there are a few shots where Montalban’s collection of Chippendale’s dancers are clustered around him very closely, like barbarians clustered at the base of their chief’s throne.

And as others have mentioned, the nautical, capital ship theme that runs through the whole production was excellent. The ships ponderously turning, sliding to a slow stop, and generally acting like things with a huge amount of mass worked exceedingly well in this movie.

One little piece of trivia that I read yeas ago: Early on McCoy asks Scotty how he is feeling, and it’s later implied that what was wrong with him was a hangover. In reality, that line is a nod to the fact that Doohan was recovering from a heart attack at the time of filming.

HA! That’s so good!

I once got a one-on-one interview with Doohan. It was at the Seattle Center. He lived in Seattle and there was something Star Trek-related, so he stopped by. It wasn’t anything groundbreaking; you could tell he was telling stories told countless times before, but I was still in awe. Wish I had gotten a photo with him.

Afterwards, my photographer and I were walking outside and we saw him sitting out on the lawn, eating some fried chicken. I had to stop her from getting a photo of it.

Not actually a joke! Many of the male extras who played Khan’s crew were active Chippendale’s dancers (e.g, Roger Menache).

I grew up on Star Wars, not Star Trek, and I first watched the Kirk/Spock death scene in JJ Abram’s second Star Wars movie. (No, seriously, he talks about how he was trying to make it more like Star Wars in every other scene of Star Trek 2009’s commentary.) Everything I’m about to say is informed by that.

Having made it back to Wrath of Khan as an outsider, and in reverse order at that, I’m convinced that the death scene is why it’s so revered. I imagine in the 1980s, especially in the wake of The Motion Picture, there wasn’t much hype for Wrath of Khan. Star Trek was passé, expectations didn’t color your viewing, and killing off your favorite character wasn’t even a possibility in the back of your mind. How very bold! It must have hit like Vader being Luke’s father back then. Now, unless you’re deeply invested in the characters, it has all the impact you’d expect after growing up with the knowledge. I even think the modern redux was more impactful purely on the basis of better acting. (I know, heresy! Wrath of Khan is a better movie anyhow.)

I could certainly feel the chemistry between cast members while watching this movie. That much came through, but I felt something else more strongly: “This is just another episode…” A damn good one, sure, but I don’t think it can justify its existence as a movie and not merely an episode of the TV show. From my outsider’s perspective, the movie that made by far the biggest impact was First Contact. That movie exemplified what it meant to be a movie about Star Trek, not just a feature length TV episode. It told a story with a scope and arc that almost had to be done as a movie. (This was before TV production basically became long-form filmmaking.) It is only surpassed by Galaxy Quest, which I can understand excluding from a Star Trek movie list, even though it is clearly the best Star Trek movie.

Why have I never seen this take? Is there some taboo against comparing TOS to TNG?

That’s certainly how I felt when I saw these movies for the first time in the 1990s. I’d seen TNG several seasons by then. So even the good TOS movies felt like just another TNG episode to me. Of course, at that time I didn’t have the knowledge of what future TNG movies would be like. That I wouldn’t like any of them as much as my favorite episodes of TNG.

I’m not certain what you’re getting at here.

I’d say that a movie doesn’t HAVE to do anything other than (mostly) stand on its own. A movie need not have galaxy-shaking events or massive scope or cosmic stakes to be good. Alien, Pitch Black, Blade Runner, Back to the Future, Gravity, Logan — all great, big-budget sci-fi movies that told small, personal stories where the stakes were generally limited to the survival of a handful of people and the fate of worlds didn’t depend on the outcome.

There are episodes of TNG that I would love to see expanded out to movie length, given a movie-level budget and a good director.

Yup! Huge taboo. Where would you even start… comparing Kirk to Picard? Comparing Spock to Data?

Madness.

Both are fully functional.

image

Yes, but only one was pined after by Jadzia Dax. The others lover didn’t even make it a full season.

Check and mate.

image

puhlease

Not for me. YMMV.

Certainly the idea of Spock’s sacrifice — “the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one” — captures the utopian socialist spirit of Star Trek. So I’m sure it resonated for many fans. Of course they immediately backtracked on it, but that’s a predictable thing for a fan favorite character in an episodic movie series.

I love the even Star Trek films, but I have to agree with whoever said up above that VI is the one because while it may not be as tightly constructed as II, what it does for the character growth of everyone in the cast, pointing them toward an actual future where they aren’t just a crew on a ship, really took everything in a direction that Spock’s death and rebirth never did.

Sulu is a goddamn starship Captain. Kirk has to bury his hatred in the face of his son’s death at the hands of the Klingons. The crew has to confront their own prejudice. Politics (not unlike what we have seen in the last four years!) within Starfleet show a whole other side of Star Trek that’s been explored since. And Spock… well, he’s on his way to being the Ambassador, and that’s a perfect evolution of his character after a life, a death, and a rebirth, that sets him on a wholly different path from Starships.

I know there are a lot here who don’t like the JJverse, but I really do, and I think I like it so much more because I loved Star Trek VI as the jumping off point for everything that’s come after it. They were able to just let go and let everyone really grow.

You know what movie really bothered me? Five. Where Uhura had to do a strip tease. That is some shit.

I’m with you on this one mate. VI forever!

I’m always going to have Tom’s voice in my head purposefully saying Mutara Nebula incorrectly to bug Dingus.

Chekov Injury Count:
ST: TMP - Electrical Burns
ST II - Ceti Eel

Oh yes… we will get to that. I’ve got things to say about Five.