Well, for providing helpful information in my time of need and at the same time not appending an appeal to be nominated yourself, you win my nomination!
I hear rowe has a history of dalliances with mechanical men. Perhaps just what we need, or perhaps the path to our doom.
In any case artificial murder machines are just the kind of thing a fascist would devise. Is he secretly creating them, or figuring out how to destroy them from within…
I will vote no on principle. The only data points we have to analyze at this stage in the game is who nominates who. We may as well draw the initial process out and get as much data as possible, to better accuse each other of being fascists/cylons later.
Crooked Craig has a bizarre fascination with the tragic and sudden end of humanity. In fact, he spends his spare time crafting story after story on the subject.
Nominating someone from the middle is suspicious. It is only matched by the suspicious act of nominating the person before you and the suspicious act of nominating the person after you.
Since our vote is going to be revealed anyway, it seemed prudent to discuss strategy. Saying “I won’t tell you how I’m voting, but we should all vote no” doesn’t make any sense. If you have an alternative plan that makes sense, I’m happy to hear it.
Theoretically any Liberal should only vote for a government that includes them. But there are almost twice as many Fascist policy cards as there are Liberal though so I’d prefer not to rely on the populace picking a random one to enact if we reject three in a row. I’d suggest approving this government and giving us the chance to start us in the right path.
Since the first votes, and even the first chancellor, are effectively no information it is best to trust people, at this point, grasp the utility of knowledge.
Voting no is a valid choice, perhaps even the wise one. But so quickly and publically voting no seems to be precisely the type of thing a fascist would do to signal das furher that rowe is not one of their own.