Eh I like the ‘ideas’ of the ideas that are continually presented, but I’m not sure that people’s ‘interpretations’ are all that consistent.
For example, of The Force Awakens, the video linked to, thought the ‘absence of love’ was interesting, which is a critique that Red Letter Media had of TFA.
So it then takes TWO films for weird edge lord Sky-stalker to end up asking Cinderella-Mulan to be his ‘Queen’ and they all both look madly confused & exchange sad faces, as usual. The problem is that it isn’t ‘Star Wars subversion’ - it is a move straight out of the Disney playbook for Princes and Princesses. Or one of the endings for KOTOR.
The idea of ‘you know who your parents are, really, and now so do I, so I will tell you about your parents, that you already know - oh they’re junkers btw’… is a bit too ‘you have amnesia’.
I’d like something more dramatic like:
“Your parents were criminals - we (the first order) arrested them. They were ‘friends’ of Han Solo - smugglers of dangerous goods. We SAVED YOU from an existence WORSE than what you have already experienced. It is only because the Resistance existed that you were left on that planet. Han covorted with some of the worst scum in the galaxy, and Leia was too naive to see it. The only reason why you feel a connection to them is because, deep down, you know they ‘created’ who you are; but I KNOW them AND their actions”…
Then leads into the possibility of asking: Was Luke smuggling Force Children!? … and it shall never be directly answered.
Star Wars Episode 9: Think of the Force Children!
So then you have your third film conflict, and you get your Mother TheReysa basically adopting the Force kids & the war orphans, which gives them a reason for existing, and the First Order’s Rule is that ‘You can’t just adopt kids into Religious sects because it is like Slavery’ AND it is ‘Smuggling’
- Grrr Kylo mad about repeating the past. Perhaps Kylo even agrees to HELP the orphanage at some point, but sees a way to subvert the situation later - he genuinely believes that ‘Smuggling’ children is an evil thing to do, no matter what reason - because Han Solo was a bad dad. Luke thought about killing Kylo, for a moment, because he HATED Han for banging Leia, and saw a link between crime and dynastic power that needed to be snuffed out… for Leia’s sake. And The Jedi. And The Galaxy. And because Kylo accused Luke of turning his pupils into slaves.
Perhaps it is even 5-6 later and a NEW set of young people are off on adventures, causing all sorts of trouble, and Kylo or Company kills a 17-20 year old Jedi - err the now-grown ‘kids’ from the Casino… and Mother TheReysa is PISSED because they are basically her children… conflict ensues.
Mother TheReysa is like Sniper Wolf from Metal Gear Solid at this point… sort of. Will do anything to protect her cubs. Luke would basically be like her “Saladin. You mean Big Boss.” - Big Boss.
So you have a conflict about the right/wrong things for the right/wrong reasons… or some ‘Grey’ moralising.
To be continued…?
- If the next film ends up being called “Children of The Force” (or maybe ‘Disciples’)… I expect Disney to send me my pay-cheque.
Also, I’m probably not the only one who half-expects Adam Driver to shout “HANNAH!” in every scene.