Anecdotally that seems true - the 2060 I ordered from Amazon on Feb 25 went from “in stock” to backordered and isn’t due to arrive until March 11.
I think a lot of folks were in the same boat as me waiting for the 1660 release before making a decision. There are a lot of 970 owners out there looking for an upgrade.
That was the case for me. I normally wouldn’t spend more than $250~ for a video card, but I sold my 970 for $125 which puts the final cost to me around what I spent on the 970 when it was new. I kinda wish I had sold my Battlefield V key as well instead of trying it because it’s not really something I’m interested in. Oh well.
Performance wise, I do wish it were a little more capable on the 4k front, but other than that I’m pleased. I was actually surprised that I was able to play Forza Horizon 4 in 4k with perfectly acceptable framerates, which looks glorious. Older games work fine as well, and everything else runs great in 1440p.
Major course-correction for Nvidia. Only question is whether they’ll go up the line, offering Turing cards at the 2070, 2080, and 2080ti performance levels at sexy-ass prices with the RTX cores chopped out.
Don’t think they will. These two cards are made for the more price sensitive consumer who simply wouldn’t go above $200-300 range no matter the fancy features listed. Don’t see them doing any 1770/1880 series cards that start to more directly compete with the 20XX ones.
The 2070 and higher cards reportedly are not selling well. But rather than ripping out the RTX cores to cut costs, Nvidia could just slice their margins. That seems like a more likely bet, rather than giving up on ray-tracing entirely.
The problem for NVIDIA is the companies aren’t going to go to the bleeding edge if their customers aren’t willing to pay for it. It’s kinda been proven that games that run on potatoes can do very, very well and that graphic tech isn’t that big a seller.